Divergent thinking tests are probably the most commonly employed measures of creative potential and have demonstrated adequate psychometric properties with many populations. Recently, however, a partial correlation evaluation revealed that the indices drawn from divergent thinking tests are highly redundant. That is, in the nongifted population, ideational “originality” and “flexibility” were seriously confounded by ideational “fluency,” and hence were not reliable indices of divergent thinking. Because the ideation of gifted individuals is qualitatively and quantitatively different from that of nongifted individuals, the present investigation utilized partial correlation procedures in order to compare the reliability of ideational originality in academically gifted and nongifted intermediate school children (N = 225). The results indicated that the divergent thinking interitem and intertest correlations of the gifted children were significantly larger than those of the nongifted children. Still, ideational originality was adequately reliable after fluency was controlled only in the figural (nonverbal) divergent thinking tests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertR. S. (1971). Cognitive development and parental loss among the gifted, the exceptionally gifted, and the creative. Psychological Reports, 29, 19–26.
2.
AlbertR. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30, 140–151.
3.
AlbertR. S. (1978). Observations and suggestions regarding giftedness, familial influence and the achievement of eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 201–211.
4.
AlbertR. S. (1980a). Genius. in WoodyR. H. (ed.), The encylopedia of clinical assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 729–743). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
AlbertR. S. (1980b). Family position and the attainment of eminence: A study of special family positions and special family experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 87–95.
BarronF.HarringtonD. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.
8.
BurtC. L. (1962). Critical note: The psychology of creative ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 32, 292–298.
9.
California Achievement Tests Technical Manual. (1979). Monterey, CA: McGraw-Hill.
10.
ChaunceyH.HiltonT. L. (1965). Are aptitude tests valid for the highly able?Science, 148, 1297–1304.
11.
ChristensenP. R.GuilfordJ. P.WilsonR. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82–88.
12.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavior scienses. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
CronbachL. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
14.
DewingK. (1970). The reliability and validity of selected tests of creative thinking in a sample of seventh-grade West Australian children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 35–42.
15.
ElkindD.DeblingerJ.AdlerD. (1970). Motivation and creativity: The context effect. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 351–357.
16.
GuilfordJ. P. (1959). Three faces of the intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.
17.
HarringtonD. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to be creative on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434–454.
18.
HocevarD. (1978). Studies in the evaluation of tests of divergent thinking. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 4658A–4686A. (University Microfilms No. 78-69)
19.
HocevarD. (1979a). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196.
20.
HocevarD. (1979b). The unidimensional nature of creative thinking in fifth grade children. Child Study Journal, 9, 273–278.
21.
HowiesonN. (1981). A longitudinal study of creativity: 1965–1975. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 117–134.
22.
JacksonP. W.MessickS. (1965). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33, 309–329.
23.
MadausG. F. (1967). Divergent thinking and intelligence: Another look at a controversial question. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 227–235.
24.
ManskeM. E.DavisG. A. (1968). Effects of simple instructional biases upon performance in the Unusual Uses test. The Journal of General Psychology, 79, 25–33.
25.
MacKinnonD. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.
MednickS. A. (1962). The associative basis for the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
28.
MilgramR. M.MilgramN. A. (1976a). Group versus individual administration in the measurement of creative thinking in gifted and nongifted children. Child Development, 47, 563–565.
29.
MilgramR. M.MilgramN. A. (1976b). Creative thinking and creative performance in Isreali students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 255–259.
30.
MilgramR. M.MilgramN.LandauE. (1974). Identification of gifted children in Israel: A theoretical and empirical investigation (Technical Research Report). Ramat-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University.
31.
MilgramR. M.RabkinL. (1980). Developmental test of Mednick's associative hierarchies of original thinking. Developmental Psychology, 16, 157–158.
32.
MoranJ. D.MilgramR. M.SawyersJ. K.FuV. R. (1983). Original thinking in preschool children. Child Development, 54, 921–926.
33.
NichollsJ. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 717–727.
34.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
OdenM. (1968). The fulfillment of a promise: 40 year follow-up. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 77, 3–93.
36.
PhillipsV. K.TorranceE. P. (1977). Levels of originality at earlier and later stages of creativity test tasks. Journal of Creative Behavior, 11, 147. (Abstract)
37.
PiperJ. (1974). The Teacher Indicator of Potential Scale. Redwood City, CA: Gifted Resource Center.
38.
RichardsR. L. (1976). A comparison of selected Guiford and Wallach-Kogan creative thinking tests in conjunction with measures of intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 151–164.
39.
RuncoM. A. (1984). Teachers' judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711–717.
40.
RuncoM. A.AlbertR. S. (1984, April). Creativity and the threshold of intelligence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
41.
RuncoM. A.SchreibmanL. (1983). Parental judgments of behavior therapy efficacy with autistic children: A social validation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13, 237–248.
42.
SchubertD. S. P. (1973). Intelligence as necessary but not sufficient for creativity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 122, 45–47.
43.
StanleyJ. C. (1977). The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh- and eighth-graders. The College Board Review, 106, 2–8.
44.
SternbergR. J. (1982). Nonentrenchment in the assessment of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 63–67.
45.
TermanL. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221–230.
46.
TorranceE. P. (1968). Examples and rationales of test tasks for assessing creative abilities. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 165–178.
47.
TorranceE. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
48.
TorranceE. P.BallO. (1978). Effects of increasing the time limit of the Just Suppose test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 281. (Abstract)
49.
VernonP. E. (1971). Effects of administration and scoring on divergent thinking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 41, 245–247.
50.
WallachM. A. (1967). Creativity and the expression of possibilities. in KaganJ. (ed.), Creativity and learning (pp. 36–57). Boston, MA: Houghton & Mifflin.
51.
WallachM. A. (1970). Creativity. in MussenP. H. (ed.), Carmichaels's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1211–1272). New York: Wiley.
52.
WallachM. A. (1971). The intelligence-creativity distinction. Morristown, NY: General Learning Press.
53.
WallachM. A. (1977). Tests tell us little about talent. in JaniceI. L. (ed.), Current trends in Psychology (pp. 237–243). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.
54.
WallachM. A.KoganN. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
55.
WallachM. A.WingC. W.Jr. (1969). The talented student. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
56.
WardW. C. (1968). Creativity in young children. Child Development, 39, 737–754.
57.
WardW. C. (1969). Rate and uniqueness in children's creative responding. Child Development, 40, 869–878.
58.
YamamotoK. (1965). Effects of restriction of range and test unreliability on correlation between measures of intelligence and creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 35, 300–305.
