Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A multidimensional scaling analysis was performed to examine how adult subjects perceive causality and chance in relation to each other. 12 hypothetical situations, representing different classes or categories of causality and chance were scaled on the basis of pairwise comparisons. The results indicated that subjects' perception of causality and chance is two-dimensional with one dimension representing the more objective, conventional chance-cause distinction and the other the more subjective cause-reason distinction. Thus, it is argued that not only Buss's (1978, 1979) logical categories of cause and reason have found empirical validation, but important theoretical implications for attribution theory can be derived.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buss, R. A. Causes and reasons in attribution theory: A conceptual critique . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 1311-1321.

Buss, R. A. On the relationship between causes and reasons . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1458-1461.

Buss, R. A. A dialectical psychology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 1979.

Friendly, M. L. and Glucksberg, S. On the description of subcultural lexicons: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 55-65.

Gergen, J. K. and Gergen, M. M. Causal attribution in the context of social explanation. In Gorlitz, D. (Ed.) Perspectives on attribution research and theory. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1980.

Harvey, J. H. , Ickes, W. J. , and Kidd R. F. (Eds.) New directions in attribution research. Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.

Jones, E. E. and Nisbett, E. R. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In Jones, E. E. , et al. (Eds.). Attributions: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown: General Learning Press, 1971.

Kelley H. H. Attribution in social interaction. Morristown: General Learning Press, 1971.

Kelley, H. H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In Levine, D. (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1967. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.

10.

Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M. Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1978.

11.

Lerner, J. M. Locus of control, perceived responsibility for prior fate . Journal of Research in Personality, 1975, 9, 1-20.

12.

Rosenberg, S. , Nelson, C. , and Vivekanathan, P. S. A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 283-294.

13.

Streufert, S. and Streufert, S. C. Attribution, dimensionality, and measurement: How you measure is what you get. In Gorlitz, D. (Ed.). Perspectives on attribution research and theory. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1980.

14.

Walster, E. Assignment of responsibility for an accident . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 73-79.

15.

Wortman, B. C. Causal attribution and personal control. In Harvey, J. H. et al. (Eds.). New directions in attribution research. Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.

Causal Attributions: Perceived Dimensions of Causality and Chance

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References