Formulas for estimating ω2 are based on the assumption that sample sizes, nj, are proportional to the sizes of their respective treatment populations. Because this assumption is frequently violated, a general method of estimating ω2 for the one-factor, fixed-effects design is presented. Given the relative sizes of the treatment populations, unbiased estimators are obtained for the population grand mean, μ, for individual treatment effects, αj, and for the numerator and denominator of ω2.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dohrenwend, B. P. , Dohrenwend, B. S., Gould, M. S., Neugebauer, R., and Wunsch-Hitzig, R.Mental illness in the United States: Epidemiological estimates. New York: Praeger, 1980.
2.
Dooling, D. J. and Danks, J. H.Going beyond tests of significance: Is psychology ready?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975, 5, 15-17.
3.
Glass, G. V and Hakstian, A. R.Measures of association in comparative experiments: Their development and interpretation. American Educational Research Journal, 1969, 6, 403-414.
4.
Hays, W. L.Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
5.
Searle, S. R.Linear models. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.
6.
Vaughan, G. M. and Corballis, M. C.Beyond tests of significance: Estimating strength of effects in selected ANOVA designs. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 204-213.
