Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of two subjective approaches to judging in synchronized swimming. Scores assigned by nationally accredited officials to 28 solo and 33 duet competitors at the 1977 Senior National AAU Outdoor Synchronized Swimming championships were examined through a multitrait-multimethod matrix. The use of one panel of 7 raters to award both execution and content scores to a performance was compared to an experimental method in which these scores were independently awarded by two panels of raters. An examination of the interrelationships between methods and scores revealed a tendency for the single panel to treat execution and content as one. Further attention to the proposal of two separate panels is recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
