Development of the Arizona Course/Instructor Evaluation Questionnaire is the result of over 15 years of research and experience in the area of instructional evaluation. The method of constructing the initial item pool, successive data analyses, subscale development, and normative data generation are described. Related research is presented demonstrating the reliability and validity of the Arizona Course/Instructor Evaluation Questionnaire.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aleamoni, L.M.The usefulness of student evaluations in improving college teachingInstructional Science, 1978, 7, 95-105.
2.
Aleamoni, L.M. and Spencer, R.E.The Illinois course evaluation questionnaire: A description of its development and a report of some of its results. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1973, 33, 669-684.
3.
Aleamoni, L.M. and Thomas, G.S.Is the instructor's rating of the class related to the class' rating of the instructor? (RR1. Tucson: University of Arizona, Office of Instructional Research and Development, 1977.
4.
Aleamoni, L.M. and Yimer, M.An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness . Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973 , 64, 274-277.
5.
Brandenburg, D.C. and Aleamoni, L.M.Illinois course evaluation questionnaire: Results interpretation manual, form 73. Urbana: University of Illinois, Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, 1976.
6.
Gillmore, G.M.Estimates of reliability coefficients for items and subscales of the Illinois course evaluation questionnaire (RR 341. Urbana : University of Illinois, Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, 1973.
7.
Spencer, R.E. and Dick, W.Course evaluation questionnaire: Manual of interpretation (RR 200 . Urbana: University of Illinois, Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, 1965.
8.
Stallings, W.M. and Spencer, R.E.Ratings of instructors in Accountancy 101 from video-tape clips (RR 265. Urbana: University of Illinois, Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, 1967.
9.
Swanson, R.A. and Sisson, D.J.The development, evaluation, and utilization of a departmental faculty appraisal system. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education , 1971, 9, 64-79.
