This study attempted to improve test validity by presenting positively keyed items from a single trait in descending order of endorsement and encouraging subjects to respond in terms of the resulting Guttman scale. This approach should explicate trait content and available scale points, thus increasing inter-and intra-subject consistency in responding. In general, the procedure produced increases in internal consistency, and in construct and concurrent validity. Increases in validity were contingent upon increases in internal consistency. Possible time-saving advantages of the ordering procedure are noted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benton, A. L.The interpretation of questionnaire items in a personality schedule. Archives of Psychology (New York), 1935, No. 190.
2.
Eisenberg, P. and Wesman, A. G.Consistency in response and logical interpretation of psychoneurotic inventory items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1941, 32, 321-338.
3.
Fiske, D. W.Subject reactions to inventory format and content. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1969, 4, 137-138.
4.
Jackson, D. N.Personality research form, Form AA. Goshen, N. Y.: Research Psychologists Press, 1965.
5.
Kuncel, R. B.Response processes and relative location of subject and item. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1973, 33, 545-563.
6.
Kuncel, R. B. and Fiske, D. W.Stability of response process and response. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1974, 34, 743-755.
7.
Turner, C. B. and Fiske, D. W.Item quality and appropriateness of response processes . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 297-315.
