In this article, the validity of using separate male and female measurement scales is seriously questioned. A variety of data is presented to support the case made against this practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, J. W.An introduction to motivation . New York: Van Nostrand, 1964.
2.
Cattell, R. B. and Eber, H. W.Manual for the 16 PF. Champaign, Illinois, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing , 1972.
3.
Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D.The approval motive. New York: Wiley, 1964.
4.
Dias, S. L.A study of personal, perceptual and motivational factors in predicting the aspiration levels of women and men towards the administrative roles in education. Doctoral Dissertation, Unpublished, Boston University, May 1975. Dissertation Abstract Number 75-20,946.
5.
Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, S. B. G.Manual for Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service , 1968.
6.
Horner, M. S.Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive and non-competitive situations. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1968. Dissertation Abstract Number 69-12,135.
7.
Jackson, D. N.Personality research form manual . Goshen, New York: Research Psychologist Press, 1967.
8.
Mehrabian, A.Male and female scales of the tendency to achieve. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1968, 28, 493-502.
9.
Mehrabian, A.Measures of achieving tendencies . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1969, 29, 445-451.
