This paper describes the rationale and development of a new measure of five interpersonal conflict-handling modes (competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating), which attempts to control for the social desirability response bias. The instrument is entitled: "Management-of-Differences Exercise," or the MODE instrument. The results of this study indicate that the new instrument significantly reduces the social desirability bias for overall population tendencies in comparison to three other conflict behavior instruments, although all four instruments may still be susceptible to some individual tendencies in this response bias. This study also investigated other aspects of substantive validity and structural validity. Lastly, this paper presented emerging evidence on external validity, which, while encouraging, suggests the need for continuing research efforts to investigate this aspect of validity for the new MODE instrument.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aram, J. D., Morgan, C. P. , and Esbeck, E. B.Relation of collaborative interpersonal relationships to individual satisfaction and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly , 1971, 16, 289-290.
2.
Blake, R. R. and Mouton, J. S.The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1964.
3.
Burke, R. J.Methods of resolving superior-subordinate conflict: The constructive use of subordinate differences and disagreements , Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1970, 5, 393-411.
4.
Campbell, D. T.Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discrimant validity. In D. N. Jackson and S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in human assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
5.
Christie, R. and Geis, F. L.Studies in macheivellianism. New York : Academic Press, 1970
6.
Corah, N. L., Feldman, M. J., Cohen, I., Gruen, W., Meadow, A., and Ringwall, E. A.Social desirability as a variable on the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958, 22, 70-72.
7.
Cronbach, L. S. and Meehl, P. E.Construct validity in psychological tests. In D. N. Jackson & S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in human assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967
8.
Cronbach, L. J.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297-334.
9.
Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D.A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960 , 24, 349-354.
10.
Edwards, A. L.The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953, 37, 90-93.
11.
Edwards, A. L.The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden, 1957.
12.
Edwards, A. L.Social desirability and the description of other. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 1959, 59, 434-436.
13.
Feldman, M. J. and Corah, N. L.Social desirability and the forced-choice method. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960, 24, 480-482.
14.
Hall, J.Conflict management survey: A survey on one's characteristic reaction to and handling of conflicts between himself and others. Conroe, Texas: Teleometrics International, 1969.
15.
Jung, C. G.Psychological types. London: Rutledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., 1923.
16.
Jamieson, D. W. and Thomas, K. W.Power and conflict in the student-teacher relationship . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974 , 10, 321-336.
17.
Kilmann, R. H. and Thomas, K. W.Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Psychological Reports, 1975, 37, 971-980.
18.
Klett, C. J. and Yaukey, D. W.A cross-cultural comparison of judgements of social desirability. Journal of Social Psychology, 1959, 49, 19-26.
19.
Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W.Organization and environment. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1967.
20.
Loevinger, J.Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. In D. M. Jackson and S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in human assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
21.
Myers, I. B.Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service , 1962.
22.
Nunnally, J. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
23.
Peak, H.Problems of objective observation . In L. Festinger and D. Katz (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Dryden Press , 1953.
24.
Radcliffe, J. A.On the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. In O. K. Buros (Ed.), Personality tests and reviews. Highland Park, New Jersey : Grypon Press, 1970.
25.
Renwick, P. A.The perception and management of interpersonal conflict in organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California— Berkeley, 1972.
26.
Ruble, T. L. and Thomas, K. W.Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 143-155.
27.
Ryan, S. G. and Clemence, J. B.Conflict resolution behavior, influence and organizational effectiveness: an integrative study. Proceedings of the 10th annual meetings of the Eastern Academy of Management, 1973.
28.
Thomas, K. W.Conflict-handling modes in interdepartmental relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University , 1971.
29.
Thomas, K. W.Conflict and conflict management. Chapter 21, of M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally , 1976. Pp. 889-935.
30.
Thomas, K. W. and Walton, R. E.Conflict-handling behavior in interdepartmental relations . Research paper no. 38. Division of research, Graduate School of Management, UCLA, 1971.
31.
Thomas, K. W. and Kilmann, R. H.Some properties of existing conflict behavior instruments . Working paper #73-11, Human Systems Development Center, Graduate School of Management, UCLA, 1973.
32.
Thomas, K. W. and Kilmann, R. H.The social desirability variable in organizational research: an alternative explanation for reported findings. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 741-752.
33.
Thomas, K. W. and Kilmann, R. H.The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Tuxedo Park, N.Y.: Xicom, Inc., 1974.
34.
Terhune, K. W.The effects of personality in cooperation and conflict. In P. Swingle (Ed.), The structure of conflict. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
35.
Thorndike, E. L.A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1920 , 4, 25-29.
36.
Walton, R. E. and McKersie, R. B.A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
