A test was administered to pharmacy students in two ways: using a computer-monitored, group-response system and using the conventional, paper-and-pencil method. Student performance on the two administrative modes was compared. Test-taking behavior for the two modes, as measured by the number and pattern of changed answers, was also compared. Three item formats (true-false, multiple-choice and matching) were analyzed separately.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baxter, B.An experimental analysis of the contributions of speed and level in an intelligence test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1941, 32, 285-296.
2.
Box, G. E. P.Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analyses of variance problems, II. Effects of inequality of variance and of correlation between errors in the two-way classification. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954, 25, 484-498.
3.
Cronbach, L. J. and Warrington, W. G.Time limit tests: Estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 167-188.
4.
Curtis, H. A. and Kroop, R. P.A comparison of scores obtained by administering a test normally and visually. Journal of Experimental Education , 1961, 29, 249-260.
5.
Davidson, W. M. and Carroll, I. B.Speed and level components in time-limit scores: A factor analysis. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1945, 5, 411-427.
6.
Dixon, W. J.Biomedical computer programs . Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, 1971, 586-600.
7.
Geisser, S. and Greenhouse, S. W.An extension of Box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958, 29, 885-891.
8.
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design procedures for the behavioral scientists. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1969.
9.
Lord, F. H.A study of speed factors in tests and academic grades. Psychometrika, 1956, 21, 31-50.
10.
Mollenkopf, W. G.Time limits and the behavior of test takers. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1960, 20, 223-230.
11.
Morrison, E. J.On test variance and the dimensions of the measurement situation. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20, 231-250.
12.
Myers, C. T.The factorial composition and validity of differently speeded tests. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 347-354.