A very simple and economical method for estimating initial parameter values for the normal ogive or logistic latent trait mental test model is outlined. The accuracy of the method in comparison with maximum likelihood estimation is investigated through the use of Monte-Carlo data. The study yields a number of observations concerning how sample size and true item parameter values of the data influence both estimation methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Jensema, C. J.An application of latent trait mental test theory to the Washington Pre-College Testing Battery. Research Bulletin, Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing, 1972.
2.
Lord, F. M.An analysis of the verbal scholastic aptitude test using Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 989-1020 .
3.
Lord, F. M.Some test theory for tailored testing. In W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
4.
Lord, F. M.Robbins-Monro procedures for tailored testing, EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1971, 31, 3 -31.
5.
Lord, F. M. and M. R. Novick.Statistical theories in mental test scores . Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley , 1968.
6.
Owen, R. J.A Bayesian approach to tailored testing. Research Bulletin 69-92, Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1969.
7.
Urry, V. W.A Monte-Carlo investigation of logistic mental test models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1970.
8.
Urry, V. W.Approximation methods for the item parameters of mental test models. Research Bulletin 0871-202, Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing , 1971. (a)
9.
Urry, V. W.Individualized testing by Bayesian estimation. Research Bulletin 0171-177, Seattle: University of Washington, Bureau of Testing, 1971. (b)
