Component analysis provides an attractive alternative to factor analysis, since component scores are easily determined while factor scores can only be estimated. Although the literature contains methods of finding component scores, intuitively reasonable but incorrect methods are commonly used to calculate component scores. This paper presents not only the correct method of determining component scores but, more importantly, also presents several illustrations of how commonly used incorrect methods distort the meaning of the component solution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cooley, W. W. and Lohnes, P. R.Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley, 1971.
2.
Farr, S. D.Component scores for reduced rank, transformed solutions. American Educational Research Journal , 1971, 8, 93-104.
3.
Fruchter, B.Introduction to factor analysis . Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Co. , 1954.
4.
Glass, G. V. and Maguire, T. O.Abuses of Factor Scores. American Educational Research Journal, 1966, 3, 297-304.
5.
Harman, H. H.Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
6.
Horst, P.Factor analysis of data matrices . New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965.
7.
Kaiser, H. F.Formulas for component scores . Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 83-87.
8.
Mulaik, S. A.The foundations of factor analysis . New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. , 1972.
9.
Schweiker, R. F.Factor scores aren't sacred: Comments on "Abuses of factor scores."American Educational Research Journal, 1967, 4, 168-170.
10.
Van de Geer, J. P.Introduction to multivariate analysis for the social sciences. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1971.