In this paper a new item analysis index, e, is derived as a function of difficulty and discrimination to represent item efficiency. It is demonstrated algebraically that the maximum discriminating power of an item may be determined from its difficulty and then item efficiency is defined as the ratio of observed discrimination to maximum discrimination. The magnitude of the e-index will range from zero to unity and will provide additional information for item analyses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carroll, J. B.The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 1961, 26, 347-372.
2.
Cureton, E. E.The upper and lower twenty-seven per-cent rule. Psychometrika, 1959, 22, 293-296.
3.
Fisher, R. A.The logic of inductive inference . Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 1935 , 98, 39-54.
4.
Henryssen, S.Gathering, analyzing, and using data on test items. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement. (2nd ed.) Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education, 1971. pp. 130-159.
5.
Johnson, A. P.Notes on a suggested index of item validity: The U-L index. Journal of Educational Psychology , 1951, 42, 499-504.
6.
Kelley, T. L.The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1939, 40, 17-19.
7.
Pearson, K.On the general theory of multiple contingency with special reference to partial contingency. Biometrika, 1916, 11, 145-158.
8.
Pearson, K.Experimental discussion of the (χ2, P) test for goodness of fit. Biometrika , 1932, 24, 351-381.
