This paper describes a procedure for item analysis using distance clustering. Rather than screen items for their contribution to predetermined factors, it groups items according to the predominant factors measured, regardless of what they are. The procedure provides an efficient method of treating unanswered items.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Curtis, E. W. and Alf, E. F.Validity, predictive efficiency, and practical significance of selection tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 327-337.
2.
Findley, W. G.A rationale for evaluation of item discrimination Statistics. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1956, 16, 175-80.
3.
Fisher, W. D.Clustering and aggregation in economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins , 1969.
4.
Hartigan, J. A.Direct clustering of a data matrix. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1972, 67, 123-29.
5.
Lazarsfeld, P. F.Latent structure analysis . In Koch, S. (Ed.) Psychology: A study of a science, Vol. 3, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
6.
Maxwell, A. E.The effect of correlated errors on estimates of reliability coefficients. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 803-811.
7.
Nunnally, J.The analysis of profile data . Psychological Bulletin, 1962, 59, 311-19.
8.
Skinner, H. A., Rampton, G. M., and Keates, W. E.An item analysis model for upgrading the classification battery—Men , Report 72-1, Canadian Forces Personnel Applied Research Unit, Toronto, April, 1972.
9.
Webster, H.Maximizing test validity by item selection. Psychometrica, 1956, 21, 153-64.
