Comparison of Tukey's T-Method and Scheffé's S-Method for Various Numbers of All Possible Differences of Averages Contrasts Under Violation of Assumptions
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 1974
Comparison of Tukey's T-Method and Scheffé's S-Method for Various Numbers of All Possible Differences of Averages Contrasts Under Violation of Assumptions
Empirical .05 and .01 rates of Type I error were compared for the Tukey and Scheffé multiple comparison techniques. The experimentwise error rate was defined over five sets of the all possible 25 differences of averages contrasts. The robustness of the Tukey and Scheffé statistics was not only related to the type of assumption violation, but also to the sets containing different numbers of contrasts. The Tukey method could be judged as robust a statistic as the Scheffé method.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Box, G. E. P.Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems I. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954, 25, 290-302. (a)
2.
Box, G. E. P.Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems II. Effects of inequality of variance and of correlation between errors in the two-way classification . Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954 , 25, 484-498. (b)
3.
Box, G. E. P. and Anderson, S. L.Permutation theory in the derivation of robust criteria and the study of departures from assumption. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 1955, 17, 1-34.
4.
IBM, 1130, Scientific Subroutine Package (1130-CM-02X) Programmer's Manual, H20-0252-1, 1967, International Business Machines Corporation.
5.
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 1968.
6.
Miller, R. G., Jr.Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1966.
7.
Petrinovich, L. R. and Hardyck, C. D.Error rates for multiple comparison methods: Some evidence concerning the frequency of erroneous conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 43-54.
8.
Ryan, T. A.Multiple comparisons in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 26-47.
9.
Ryan, T. A.The experiment as the unit for computing rates of error. Psychological Bulletin, 1962, 59, 301-305.
10.
Scheffé, H.A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 1953 , 40, 87-104.
11.
Scheffé, H.The analysis of variance. New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1959.
12.
Smith, R. A.The effect of unequal group size on Tukey's HSD procedure. Psychometrika, 1971 , 36, 31-34.
13.
Tukey, J. W.The problem of multiple comparisons . Unpublished manuscript, 1953, Princeton University.
