Type of Content,Type of Score,and Response Inconsistency in Comparison Measures of Preference

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to determine the influence of type of content and type of score on response inconsistency. Types of content included: color preference, preference for work situations and preference for teacher characteristics. Types of scores were: circular triad score on the upper triangle, circular triad score on the lower triangle, and inconsistency score from a comparison of upper and lower triangles, all scores from a paired-comparison matrix. Results confirmed a previous finding that type of score was a much more significant source of variation than other instrument characteristics (type of content, number of items or item format). Other findings cast doubt on the utility of the types of scores used as measures of a response inconsistency trait.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ace, M. E. and Dawis, R. V. The contributions of questionnaire length, format, and type of score to response inconsistency. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1972, 32, 1003-1011.

Bentler, P. M. , Jackson, D. N. , and Messick, S. Identification of content and style: A two dimensional interpretation of acquiescence . Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 186-204.

Block, J. The challenge of response sets. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.

Block, J. On further conjectures regarding acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 1971 , 76, 205-210.

Bock, R. D. , Dicken, C. , and Pelt, J. V. Methodological implications of content-acquiescence correlation in the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 127-139.

Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81-105.

Chapman, L. J. and Bock, R. D. Components of variance due to acquiescence and content in the F scale measure of authoritarian-ism. Psychological Bulletin, 1958, 55, 328-333.

Cochran, W. B. and Cox, G. M. Experimental design. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley & Sons, 1957 .

Cronbach, L. J. Further evidence on response sets and test design. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1950, 10, 3-31.

10.

Cronbach, L. J. Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true-false test. Journal of Educational Psychology , 1942, 33, 401-415.

11.

Edwards, A. L. The social desirability variable in personality assessment. New York: Dryden, 1957.

12.

Elliott, L. L. Effects of item construction and respondent aptitude on response acquiescence. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1961, 21, 405-415.

13.

Gay, E. G. , Weiss, D. J. , Hendel, D. D. , Dawis, R. V. , and Lofquist, L. H. Manual for the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire . Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 1971, No. 27.

14.

Gulliksen, H. , Saunders, D. R. , and Tucker, L. R. Ability to make consistent judgments in paired comparisons as a predictor of academic achievement. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1954. Preliminary research report.

15.

Hays, W. L. Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963, Chapter 12.

16.

Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S. Acquiescence and desirability as response determinants on the MMPI. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1961, 21, 771-792.

17.

Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S. Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 1958, 55, 243-252.

18.

Messick, S. Response style and content measures from personality inventories. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1962, 22, 41-56.

19.

Pemberton, W. A. Consistency of preference as an aspect of personality. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York City, 1966.

20.

Rorer, L. G. The great response-style myth . Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 129-156.

21.

Tversky, A. Intransitivity of preferences . Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 31-48.