Benton, A. L.The interpretation of questionnaire items in a personality schedule. Archives of Psychology (New York) , 1935, No. 190.
2.
Eisenberg, P.Individual interpretation of psychosomatic inventory items. Journal of General Psychology , 1941, 25, 19-40.
3.
Eisenberg, P. and Wesman, A. G.Consistency in response and logical interpretation of psychoneurotic inventory items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1941, 32, 321-338.
4.
Fiske, D. W.Homogeneity and variation in measuring personality. American Psychologist, 1963, 18, 643-652.
5.
Fiske, D. W.Some hypotheses concerning test adequacy. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1966, 26, 69-88.
6.
Fiske, D. W.Items and persons: Formal duals and psychological differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 1968, 3, 393-402.
7.
Goldberg, L. R.A model of item ambiguity in personality assessment. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1963, 23, 467-492.
8.
Jackson, D. N.Personality research form, Form A. Goshen, N. Y.: Research Psychologists Press, Inc., 1965.
9.
Kuncel, R. B.Response processes and relative location of subject and item. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1970.
10.
Rasch, G.Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut, 1960.
11.
Rogers, T. B.The process of responding to personality items: Some issues, a theory, and some research. Research Bulletin No. 160, University of Western Ontario, 1970.
12.
Turner, C. B.Stability and homogeneity of test responses as related to appropriateness of response processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1966.
13.
Turner, C. B. and Fiske, D. W.Item quality and appropriateness of response processes . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 297-315.
14.
Tyler, T. A.Intervening processes in responding to test items. Unpublished minor research paper, University of Chicago, 1965.
15.
Tyler, T. A.Response stability, person-item distance, and homogeneity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1968.
16.
Wright, B. and Panchapakesan, N.Item analysis by the Rasch model. Program No. UCSL 801, University of Chicago Computation Center, 1968.
