Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1973-04
Johnson-Neyman Revisited: Determining Interactions Among Group Regressions and Plotting Regions of Significance in the Case of Two Groups,Two Predictors,and One Criterion
Abelson, R.P.A note on the Neyman-Johnson techniquePsychometrika , 1953, 18, 213-217.
2.
Borich, G.D.Interactions among group regressions: Testing homogeneity of group regressions and plotting regions of significanceEDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1971, 31, 251-253.
3.
Borich, G.D.Homogeneity of slopes test for multiple regression equations with reference to aptitude-treatment interactionsJournal of Experimental Education, 1972, 40, 39-42.
4.
Bottenberg, R.A. and Ward, J.H.Applied Multiple Linear Regression, PRL-TDR-63-6, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, 1963.
5.
Carroll, J.B. and Wilson, G.F.An interactive-computer program for the Johnson-Neyman technique in the case of two groups, two predictor variables, and one criterion variableEDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1970, 30, 121-132.
6.
Cohen, J.Multiple regression as a general data-analytic systemPsychological Bulletin, 1968, 6, 426-443.
7.
Johnson, P.O. and Fay, L.C.The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and applicationPsychometrika, 1950, 15, 349-367.
8.
Johnson, P.O. and Jackson, R.W.Modern statistical methods: Descriptive and inductiveChicago: Rand McNally, 1959.
9.
Johnson, P.O. and Neyman, J.Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problemsStatistical Research Memoirs, 1936 , 1, 57-63.
10.
Koenker, R.H. and Hansen, C.W.Steps for the application of the Johnson-Neyman technique—a sample analysisJournal of Experimental Education , 1942, 10, 164-173.
11.
McNemar, Q.Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1962.
12.
Potthoff, R.F.On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereofPsychometrika, 1964, 29, 241-256.
13.
Walker, H. and Lev, J.Statistical inferenceNew York: Holt, 1953.