Gitter, A.G.Factor analytic approach to indexing multivariate dataBoston University Communication Research Center Report, No. 43, August, 1970.
2.
Goldstein, J.H., Rosnow, R.L., Goodstadt, B.E., and Suls, J.M.The "good subject" in verbal operant conditioning researchJournal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1972, 6, 29-33.
3.
Himelstein, P.Taylor scale characteristics of volunteers and nonvolunteers for psychological experimentsJournal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 52, 138-139.
4.
Jung, J.Current practices and problems in the use of college students for psychological researchCanadian Psychologist, 1969, 10, 280-290.
5.
Lana, R.E.Pretest sensitization In R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in Behavioral ResearchNew York: Academic Press, 1969.
6.
Lana, R.E. and Menapace, R.H.Subject commitment and demand characteristics in attitude changeJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971 , 20, 136-140.
7.
Newman, M.Personality differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for psychological investigations. (Doctoral dissertation, New York University School of EducationAnn Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, 1956, No. 19-999.
8.
Ora, J.P., Jr.Personality characteristics of college freshman volunteers for psychological experiments Unpublished master's thesis, Vanderbilt University , 1966.
9.
Orne, M.T.On the social psychology of the psychological experiment : With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implicationsAmerican Psychologist, 1962, 17, 776-783.
10.
Page, M.M.Role of demand awareness in the communicator credibility effectJournal of Social Psychology, 1970, 82, 57-66.
11.
Pauling, F.J. and Lana, R.E.The effects of pretest commitment and information upon opinion changeEDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1969, 29, 653-663.
12.
Rosnow, R.L.One-sided versus two-sided communication under indirect awareness of persuasive intentPublic Opinion Quarterly , 1908 , 32, 95-101.
13.
Rosnow, R.L.When he lends a helping hand, bite itPsychology Today , 1970, 4(1), 26-30.
14.
Rosnow, R.L. and Rosenthal, R.Volunteer effects in behavioral research In K. Craik, B. Kleinmuntz, R. L. Rosnow, R. Rosenthal, J. A. Cheyne, and R. H. Walters, New Directions in Psychology 4. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970 .
15.
Rosnow, R., Rosenthal, R., McConochie, R.M. and Arms, R.L.Volunteer effects on experimental outcomesEDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1969, 29, 825-846.
16.
Rosnow, R.L. and Suls, J.M.Reactive effects of pretesting in attitude researchJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970 , 15, 338343.
17.
Schubert, D.S.P.Arousal seeking as a motivation for volunteering : MMPI scores and central-nervous-system-stimulant use as suggestive of a traitJournal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 1964,28,337-340.
18.
Schultz, D.P.The human subject in psychological researchPsychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 214-228.
19.
Sigall, H., Aronson, E., and Van Hoose, T.The cooperative subject : Myth or reality?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1970, 6, 1-10.
20.
Silverman, I.Role-related behavior of subjects in laboratory studies of attitude changeJournal of Personality and Social Psychology , 1968, 8, 343-348.
21.
Silverman, I. and Shulman, A.D.A conceptual model of artifact in attitude change studiesSociometry, 1970, 33, 97-107.
Solomon, R.L.An extension of control group designPsychological Bulletin , 1949, 46, 137-150.
24.
Wicker, A.W.Requirements for protecting privacy of human subjects : Some implications for generalization of research findingsAmerican Psychologist , 1968, 23, 70-72.
