Adams, J. F.The effect of non-normally distributed criterion scores on item analysis techniques. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 , 317-320 .
2.
Aleamoni, L. M. and Spencer, R. E.A comparison of biserial discrimination, point biserial discrimination and difficulty indices in item analysis data. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1969,29,353- 358 .
3.
Brogden, H. E.On the interpretation of the correlation coefficient as a measure of predictive efficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1946, 37 , 65-76.
4.
Clemans, W. V.An index of item-criterion relationship. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1958, 18, 167 -172.
5.
Engelhart, M. D.A comparison of several item discriminative indices. Journal o f Educational Measurement , 1965, 2, 69-70.
6.
Glass, G. V.Note on rank biserial correlation . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1966, 26, 623 -631.
7.
Richardson, M. V.The relation of difficulty to the differential validity of a test. Psychometrika, 1936,1,33 -49.
8.
Stanley, J. C.An important similarity between biserial r and the Brogden-Cureton-Glass biserial r for ranks. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 249-253 .
