Anderson, N. H.Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 272-279.
2.
Bentler, P. M.Review of "The challenge of response sets."American Scientist, 1966, 54, 495.
3.
Bentler, P. M.Semantic space is (approximately) bipolar. Journal of Psychology, 1969, 71, 33-40.
4.
Bentler, P. M.Clustran, a program for oblique transformation. Behavioural Science, 1971 , 16, 183-185.
5.
Block, J.The challenge of response sets. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
6.
Block, J.Remarks on Jackson's "Review" of Block's "Challenge of response sets."EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1967, 27, 497-502.
7.
Clayton, M. B. and Jackson, D. N.Equivalence range, acquiescence, and overgeneralization . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1961, 21, 371-382.
8.
Cronbach, L. J.Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true-false test. Journal of Educational Psychology , 1942, 33, 401-415.
9.
Cronbach, L. J.Response sets and test validity . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1946, 6, 475-494.
10.
Cronbach, L. J.Further evidence on response sets and test design. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1950, 10,3-31.
11.
Guttman, L.What lies ahead for factor analysis . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1958, 18, 497-515.
12.
Hanley, C.The "difficulty" of a personality inventory item. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1962, 22, 577-584.
13.
Jackson, D. N.Manual for the Personality Research Form. Goshen, N. Y.: Research Psychologists Press, 1967 (a).
14.
Jackson, D. N.Acquiescence response styles: Problems of identification and control. In I. A. Berg (Ed.), Response set in personality assessment . Chicago: Aldine, 1967 (b). Pp. 71-114.
15.
Jackson, D. N.Block's "The challenge of response sets": A review. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1967, 27, 207-219. (c)
16.
Jackson, D. N.Balanced scales, item overlap and the stables of Augeas. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1967, 27, 502-507. (d)
17.
Jackson, D. N. and Lay, C. H.Homogeneous dimensions of personality and scale content . Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1968 ,3,321-338.
18.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S.Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 1958, 55, 243-252.
19.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S.Acquiescence and desirability as response determinants on the MMPI. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1961, 21, 771-790.
20.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S.Response styles on the MMPI: Comparison of clinical and normal samples. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 1962, 65, 285-299.
21.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S.Acquiescence: The nonvanishing variance component. American Psychologist, 1965, 20, 498. (Abstract)
22.
League, B. J. and Jackson, D. N.Conformity, veridicality, and self-esteem. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964,68,113-115.
23.
Lentz, T. F.Acquiescence as a factor in the measurement of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 1938, 35, 659. (Abstract)
24.
Lichtenstein, E. and Bryan, J. H.Acquiescence and the MMPI: An item reversal approach . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1965, 70, 290-293.
25.
Martin, J.Acquiescence—measurement and theory. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1964, 3, 216-225.
26.
Messick, S.The psychology of acquiescence: An interpretation of research evidence. In I. A. Berg (Ed.), Response set in personality assessment . Chicago: Aldine, 1967. Pp. 115-145.
27.
Messick, S. and Jackson, D. N.Acquiescence and the factorial interpretation of the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 1961, 58, 299-304.
28.
Peabody, D.Attitude content and agreement set in scales of authoritarianism, dogmatism, anti-Semitism, and economic conservatism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 1-11.
29.
Quinn, R. P.Conformity, personality and the extraneous third variable—acquiescence response set. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1963.
30.
Rorer, L. G.The great response style myth . Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 129-156.
31.
Rorer, L. G. and Goldberg, L. R.Acquiescence in the MMPI?EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1965, 25, 801-817. (a).
32.
Rorer, L. G. and Goldberg, L. R.Acquiescence and the vanishing variance component . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 49, 422-430. (b)
33.
Stricker, L. J., Messick, S., and Jackson, D. N.Desirability judgments and self-reports as predictors of social behaviour . Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1968, 3, 151-167.
34.
Trott, D. M. and Jackson, D. N.An experimental analysis of acquiescence. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1967,2,278-288.
35.
Wiggins, J. S.Strategic, method, and stylistic variance in the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 1962, 59, 224-242.
36.
Wiggins, J. S.An MMPI item characteristic deck. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1964, 24, 137-141.
