Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.The authoritarian personality . New York; Harper, 1950.
2.
Cronbach, L. J.Further evidence on response sets and test design. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1950, 10, 3-31.
3.
Gordon, L. V.The effect of position on the preference value of personality items. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1952, 12, 669-676.
4.
Gordon, L. V.Survey of interpersonal values . Chicago: Science Research Associates , 1960.
5.
Gordon, L. V.Validity of scoring methods for bipolar scales. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1967, 27, 1099-1106. (a)
6.
Gordon, L. V.Survey of personal values. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1967. (b)
7.
Gordon, L. V.Work environment preference schedule. Albany: Author, 1968. (a)
8.
Gordon, L. V.Correlates of bureaucratic orientation . In Proceedings of XVIth International Congress of Applied Psychology. Amsterdam: 1968,291-297. (b)
9.
Gordon, L. V.Measurement of Bureaucratic Orientation. Personnel Psychology, 1970, 23, 1-11.
10.
Gordon, L. V. and Kikuchi, A.Response sets of Japanese and American students. Journal of Social Psychology, 1970, 82, 143-148.
11.
Guilford, J. P.Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw Hill, 1965.
12.
Hamilton, D. L.Personality attributes associated with extreme response style. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 192-203.
13.
Korn, H. A. and Giddan, N. S.Scoring methods and construct validity of the dogmatism scale. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1964, 24, 867-874.
14.
Mitzel, H. E., Rabinowitz, W., and Ostreicher, L. M.The effects of response sets on the validity of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1956, 16, 501-515.
