Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Coombs
C. H.
A theory of data , New York : Wiley , 1964 .
2.
Crawford
P. L.
Comparison of two attitude scaling methods . Psychological Reports , 1965 , 17 , 681 –682 .
3.
Edwards
A. L.
Wright
C. E.
Lunneborg
C. E.
A note on Social desirability as a variable in the EPPS
. Journal of Consulting Psychology , 1959 , 23 , 558 .
4.
Ekman
G.
Künnapas
T.
Measurement of aesthetic value by “direct” and “indirect” methods . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 1962 , 3 , 33 –39 .
5.
Ekman
G.
Künnapas
T.
A further study of direct and indirect scaling methods . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 1963 , 4 , 77 –80 .
6.
Feldman
M. J.
Corah
N. L.
Social desirability and the forced-choice method . Journal of Consulting Psychology , 1960 , 24 , 480 –482 .
7.
Galanter
E. H.
Messjck
S.
The relation between category and magnitude scales of loudness . Psychological Review , 1961 , 68 , 363 –372 .
8.
Hofstee
W. K. B.
Secular trends in an adjective checklist . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 1966 , 26 , 363 –367 .
9.
Hofstee
W. K. B.
Methods effects in absolute and comparative judgment . Unpublished dissertation, 1967 .
10.
Hofstee
W. K. B.
Method effects in judging the desirability of traits . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 1969 , 29 , 583 –604 .
11.
Torgerson
W. S.
Theory and methods of scaling . New York : Wiley , 1958 .