BurkheimerG. J.ZimmermanD. W.WilliamsR. H.The maximum reliability of a multiple-choice test as a function of number of items, number of choices, and group heterogeneity. Journal of Experimental Education, 1967, 35, 80–94.
2.
CarrollJ. B.The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between tests. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 1–19.
3.
ChernoffH.The scoring of multiple-choice questionnaires. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962, 33, 375–393.
4.
CoombsC. H.MilhollandJ. E.WomerJ. F. B.The assessment of partial knowledge. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956, 16, 13–37.
5.
DeFinettiB.Methods for discriminating levels of partial knowledge. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1965, 18, 87–123.
6.
DickW.Item weighting: Test parameter effects and a comparison of the efficiency of various weighting methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1965.
7.
FraryR. B.Elimination of the guessing component of multiple-choice test scores: Effect on reliability and validity and an evaluation of related item-weighting methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1968.
8.
GuttmanL.A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 255–282.
9.
HorstP.Psychological measurement and prediction. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc., 1966. P. 279.
10.
NovickM. R.The axioms and principal results of classical test theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966, 3, 1–18.
11.
PlumleeL. B.The effect of difficulty and chances success on item-test correlation and test reliability. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 69–86.
12.
ZimmermanD. W.WilliamsR. H.RhemH. H.ElmoreW.Empirical estimates of intercorrelations among the components of scores on multiple-choice tests. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 651–654.