Bloom, B. S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. R.Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans, Green, 1956.
2.
Fishman, J. A.Some Social-Psychological Theory for Selecting and Guiding College Students. In N. Sanford (Ed.), The American College. New York: Wiley, 1962. Pp. 666-689.
3.
Gage, N. L.Paradigms for Research on Teaching . In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. Pp. 94-141.
4.
Gage, N. L.Theories of Teaching. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of Learning and Instruction, Sixty-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964. Pp. 268-285.
5.
Guilford, J. P.Intellectual Resources and Their Values as Seen by Scientists. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development. New York: Wiley, 1963 . Pp. 101-118.
6.
Guilford, J. P.The Nature of Human Intelligence . New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
7.
Guilford, J. P. and Hoepfner, R.Structure-of-intellect Factors and Their Tests. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, No. 36. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, June 1966.
8.
Guilford, J. P. and Tenopyr, M. L.Implications of the Structure-of-intellect Model for High School and College Students. In W. B. Michael (Ed.), Teaching for Creative Endeavor. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1968. Pp. 25-45.
9.
Guilford, J. P., Merrifield, P. R., deMille, R., and O'Sullivan, Maureen.An Exploratory Investigation of Behavioral (Social) Intelligence by a Factor-analytic Approach. (Final Report, National Science Foundation Grant G-18074Los Angeles : University of Southern California, 1962.
10.
Hills, J. R.The Relationship between Certain Factor-analyzed Abilities and Success in College Mathematics. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, No. 15. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, August 1955.
11.
Michael, J. J.Structure of Intellect Theory and the Validity of Achievement Examinations. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 1141-1149.
12.
Michael, W. B.Differential Testing of High-Level Personnel. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1957, 17, 475-490.
13.
Michael, W. B.Measurement and Prediction in the College Admissions Process: Some Possible Directions for Future Research . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1965, 25, 55-72.
14.
Michael, W. B.The College and University . In W. B. Michael (Ed.), Teaching for Creative Endeavor. Bloomington, Ind. : Indiana University Press, 1968 . Pp. 237-260.
15.
Michael, W. B. and Boyer, E. L.Campus Environment. Review of Educational Research, 1965, 35, 264-276.
16.
Pace, C. R.CUES: College & University Environment Scales. Preliminary Manual. Princeton, N.J. : Educational Testing Service, 1962.
17.
Ryans, D. G.Assessment of Teacher Behavior and Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 1963, 33, 415-441.
18.
Schmadel, Elnora.The Relationship of Creative Thinking Abilities to School Achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1960.
19.
Stern, G. G.Environments for Learnings. In N. Sanford (Ed.), The American College. New York: Wiley, 1962. Pp. 690-730.
20.
Thistlethwaite, D. L.The College Environment as a Determinant of Research Potentiality. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development. New York: Wiley, 1963 . Pp. 265-277.