Angoff, W. H. and Huddleston, E. M.The Multi-level Experiment. A Study of a Two-Stage Test System for the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test . Statistical Report 58-21. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1958.
2.
Armitage, P.Sequential Analysis with More Than Two Alternative Hypotheses, and Its Relation to Discriminant Function Analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1950, 12, 137-144.
3.
Bayroff, A. G. and Seeley, L. C.An Exploratory Study of Branching Tests. Technical Report Note 188, June 1967, U. S. Army BSRL.
4.
Cleary, T. Anne, Linn, R. L., and Rock, D. A.An Exploratory Study of Programmed Tests. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968,28,345-360. (a)
5.
Cleary, T. Anne, Linn, R. L., and Rock, D. A.Reproduction of Total Test Score through the Use of Sequential Programmed Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 183-187. (b)
6.
Flaugher, R. L., Melton, R. S., and Myers, C. T.Item Rearrangement under Typical Test Conditions. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 813-824.
7.
Mollenkopf, W. G.An Experimental Study of the Effects on Item-Analysis Data of Changing Item Placement and Test Time Limit. Psychometrika, 1950, 15, 291-315.
8.
Patterson, J. J.An Evaluation of the Sequential Method of Psychological Testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1962.
9.
Statistical Research Group, Columbia University. Sequential Analysis of Statistical Data, Applications. New York: Columbia University Press, 1945.