Bryan, M. M., Burke, P. J. , and Stewart, N.Correction for Guessing in the Scoring of Pretests: Effect Upon Item Difficulty and Item Validity Indices. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS , 1952, 12, 45-56.
2.
Cureton, E. E.Correction For Guessing. Journal of Experimental Education, 1966,34,44-47.
3.
Davis, F. B.Educational Measurements and Their Interpretations. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1964, pp. 81-93.
4.
Davis, F. B.Item Selection Techniques, in Lindquist, E. F. (editor) Educational Measurement, Washington, D. C., American Council on Education, 1951.
5.
Edgington, E. S.Scoring Formulas That Correct For Guessing. Journal of Experimental Education, 1965, 33, 345-346.
Jackson, R. A.Guessing and Test Performance . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1955, 15, 74-79.
8.
Little, E. B.Overcorrection for Guessing in Multiple-Choice Test Scoring. Journal of Education Research , 1962, 55, 245-52.
9.
Little, J. B.Overcorrection and Undercorrection in Multiple-Choice Test Scoring. Journal of Experimental Education , 1966, 35, 44-47.
10.
Lord, F. M.Do Tests of the Same Length Have the Same Standard Error of Measurement?EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1957, 17, 510-521.
11.
Lord, F. M.Guessing and Test Performance. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1963, 23, 663-672.
12.
Merwin, J. C.Rational and Mathematical Relationships of Six Scoring Procedures Applicable To Three-Choice Items. Journal of Education Psychology, 1959, 50, 153-161.
13.
Michael, W. B.Stewart, R. , Douglas, B., and Rainwater, J. H.An Experimental Determination of the Optimal Scoring Formula for Highly Speeded Test Under Different Instructions Regarding Scoring Penalties. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1963,23,83-99.
14.
Ruch, G. M. and De Graff, M. H.Correction for Chance and 'Guess' Versus 'Do Not Guess' Instructions In Multiple-Response Tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1926, 17, 368-375.
15.
Ruch, G. M. and Stoddard, G. D.Comparative Reliabilities of Five Types of Objective Examinations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1925, 16, 89-103.