Weighting and Guessing on Varieties of the Multiple-Choice Item

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken, L. R. A Simplified Method for Scoring the Rearrangement Test Item. The Psychological Record, 1964, 14, 411-416.

Aiken, L. R. Some General Forms of the Recognition Test Item. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1965, 33, 363-365. (a)

Aiken, L. R. The Probability of Chance Success on Objective Test Items. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1965, 25, 127-134. (b)

Aiken, L. R. The Effect on Test Score Variance of Differential Weighting of Item Responses. Psychological Reports, 1967, 21, 585-590.

Bernhardson, C. S. Determination of the Chance Score on the Three-Decision Multiple-Choice Test. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 559-562.

Bernhardson, C. S. Comparison of the Three-Decision and Conventional Multiple-Choice Tests. Psychological Reports , 1967, 20, 695-698.

Davis, F. B. Estimation and Use of Scoring Weights for Each Choice in Multiple-Choice Test Items. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1959, 19, 291-298.

Davis, F. B. and Fifer, G. The Effect on Test Reliability and Validity of Scoring Aptitude and Achievement Tests with Weights for Every Choice. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1959, 19, 159-170.

Rao, C. R. Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1952.

10.

Willey, C. F. The Three-Decision Multiple-Choice Test: A Method of Increasing the Sensitivity of the Multiple-Choice Item . Psychological Reports, 1960, 7, 475-477.