Broen, W. and Wirt, R.Varieties of Response Sets. Journal of Consulting Psychology , 1958, 22, 237-240.
2.
Chase, C. I.Relative Length of Option and Response Set in Multiple-Choice Items. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1964, 24, 861-866.
3.
Connerly, J. A. and Wantman, M. J.An Explanation of Oral Reasoning Processes in Responding to Objective Test Items. Journal of Educational Measurement , 1964, 1, 59-64.
4.
Cronbach, L. J.Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1950, 10, 3-31.
5.
Cronbach, L. J.Essentials of Psychological Testing. (2nd ed.) New York: Harper, 1960.
6.
Ebel, R.Measuring Educational Achievement . New Jersey: Prentice-Hall , 1965.
7.
French, J. W.The Relationship of Problem-Solving Styles to the Factor Composition of Tests. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1965, 25, 9-28.
8.
Helmstadter, G. C.Principles of Psychological Measurement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts , 1964.
9.
Metfessel, N. S. and Sax, G.Systematic Biases in the Keying of Correct Responses on Certain Standard Tests. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1958, 18, 787-790.
10.
Millman J., Bishop, C., and Ebel, R.An Analysis of Test-Wiseness . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1965, 25, 707-726.
11.
Moore, J. C., Schutz, R. E., and Baker, R. L.The Application of a Self-Instructional Technique to Develop a Test-Taking Strategy. American Educational Research Journal, 1966, 3, 13-17.
12.
Reile, P. J. and Briggs, L. J.Should Students Change Their Initial Answers on Objective-Type Tests? More Evidence Regarding an Old Problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1952, 43, 110-115.
13.
Vernon, P. E.Symposium on the Effects of Coaching and Practice in Intelligence Tests: Conclusions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1954, 24, 57-63.