Bartlett, C. J., Quay, L. C., and Wrightsman, L. S. Jr.A Comparison of Two Methods of Attitude Measurement: Likert-Type and Forced Choice. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1960, 20, 699-704.
2.
Edwards, A. L.Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts , 1957.
3.
Gordon, L. V.Validities of the Forced-Choice and Questionnaire Methods of Personality Measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951, 35, 407-412.
4.
Green, B. F.Attitude Measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol.I. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1954 , 335-369.
5.
Guilford, J. P.Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.
6.
Hevner, Kate.An Empirical Study of Three Psychophysical Methods. Journal of General Psychology, 1930, 4, 191-212.
7.
Hoyt, C. J.Test Reliability Estimated by Analysis of Variance. Psychometrika, 1941 , 3, 153-160.
8.
Knapp, R. R.An Empirical Investigation of the Concurrent and Observational Validity of an Ipsative Versus a Normative Measure of Six Interpersonal Values. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1964, 24, 65-73.
9.
Knapp, T. R.Interactive vs. Ipsative Measurement of Career Interest. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1966, 44,482-486.
10.
McNemar, Q.Psychological Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1962.
11.
Perry, D. K.Forced-Choice vs. L-I-D Response Items in Vocational Interest Measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1955, 39, 256-262.
12.
Saffir, M. A. A Comparative Study of Scales Constructed by Three Psychological Methods. Psychometrika , 1937, 2, 179-198.
13.
Siegel, S.Nonparametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
14.
Thorndike, E. L.Handwriting. Teacher's College Record, XI, No. 2 (1910), (whole issue).
15.
Thurstone, L. L. and Chave, E. J.The Measurement of Attitude. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.
16.
Way, H. H.The Relationship between Forced-Choice Scores and Differential Response Scores on the Kuder Preference Record-Vocational . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Indiana , 1953.
17.
Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V. , England, G. W., and Lofquist, L. H.The Measurement of Vocational Needs. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 1964, No. 16, (whole issue). (a)
18.
Weiss, D. J.Dawis, R. V.England, G. W., and Lofquist, L. H.Construct Validation Studies of the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 1964, No. 18, (whole issue). (b)
19.
Zuckerman, J. V.Interest Item Response Arrangement as it Affects Discriminiation between Professional Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1952, 36, 79-85.