Hammond, K. R., Hursch, C. J., and Todd, F. J.Analyzing the Components of Clinical Inference. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 438-456.
2.
Hoffman, P. J.Assessment of the Independent Contributions of Predictors. Psychological Bulletin, 1962, 59, 77-80.
3.
Hursch, C. J., Hammond, K. R., and Hursch, J. L.Some Methodological Considerations in Multiple-Cue Probability Studies. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 42-60.
4.
Madden, J. M.An Application to Job Evaluation of a Policy-Capturing Model for Analyzing Individuals and Group Judgment. Lackland Air Force Base, Texas : 6570th Personnel Research Laboratory, Aerospace Medical Division, May 1963 . (PRL-TDH-63-15)
5.
Naylor, J. C. and Schenck, E. A.A Revised Summary of the Multiple Cue Model and its Related Performance Indices. Statistical Parameters of Choice Behavior. Research Paper No. 2, June 1965. (Mimeo.)
6.
Naylor, J. C. and Wherry, R. J.Feasibility of Distinguishing Supervisors' Policies in Evaluation of Subordinates by Using Ratings of Simulated Job Incumbents . Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Personnel Research Laboratory, Aerospace Medical Division, October 1964. (PRL-TR-64-25)
7.
Naylor, J. C. and Wherry, R. J., Sr.The Use of Simulated Stimuli, Multiple Regression, and the JAN Technique to Capture and Cluster the Policies of Raters. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1965, 25, 969-986.
8.
Peterson, C. R., Hammond, K. R., and Summers, D. A.Optimal Responding in Multiple-Cue Probability Learning. Behavior Research Laboratory Report No. 49, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1965.
9.
Schenck, E. A. and Naylor, J. C.Some Data Concerning Performance Indices Based upon the Multiple Regression Model when Applied in a Standard Multiple Cue Situation . Paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Association meetings, April 1965.
10.
Smedslund, J.Multiple Probability Learning . Oslo: Akademisk Forlag , 1955.
11.
Summers, S. A.The Learning of Responses to Multiple Weighted Cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1962, 64, 29-34.
12.
Tucker, L. R.A Suggested Formulation in the Development by Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch, and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 528-530.
13.
Uhl, C. N.Learning of Interval Concepts: I. Effects of Differences in Stimulus Weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 264-273.
14.
Ward, J. Comments on "the Paramorphic Representation of Clinical Judgment." Psychological Bulletin, 1962, 59, 74-76.
15.
Wherry, R. J., Sr. and Naylor, J. C.Comparison of Two Approaches—JAN and PROF—for Capturing Rater Strategies. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1966, 26, 267-286.