Bass, B. M. "Development and Evaluation of a Scale for Measuring Social Acquiescence." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LIII (1956 ), 296-299.
2.
Benton, A. L. and Stone, I. R. "Consistency of Response to Personality Inventory Items as a Function of Interval between Test and Retest." Journal of Social Psychology, VIII ( 1937), 143-146.
3.
Berg, I. A. "The Unimportance of Test Item Content." In B. M. Bass and I. A. Berg (Editors), Objective Approaches to Personality Assessment. New York: Van Nostrand, 1959.
4.
Berg, I. A. "Measuring Deviant Behavior by Means of Deviant Response Sets." In I. A. Berg and B. M. Bass (Editors), Conformity and Deviation. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1961.
5.
Block, J.The Challenge of Response Sets. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
6.
Chapman, L. J. and Campbell, D. T. "Absence of Acquiescence Response Set in the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale." Journal of Consulting Psychology , XXIII (1959), 465-466.
7.
Copi, I. M.Symbolic Logic. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1954.
8.
Christie, R. and Lindauer, F. "Personality Structure." Annual Review of Psychology, XIV (1963), 201-238.
9.
Forehand, G. A. "Relationships among Response Sets and Cognitive Behaviors." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XXII (1962),287-302.
10.
Goldberg, L. R. and Rorer, L. G. "Test-retest Item Statistics for Original and Reversed MMPI Items." Oregon Research Institute Research Mongraph , III, No. 1 (1963).
11.
Gray, C. W. and Crisp, H. E. "The Credibility of Pure Response Set." Paper read at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, 1961.
12.
Husek, T. R. "Acquiescence as a Response Set and as a Personality Characteristic." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XXI (1961), 295-308.
13.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S. "Content and Style in Personality Assessment." Psychological Bulletin, LV ( 1958 ), 243-252.
14.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S. "Response Styles on the MMPI: Comparison of Clinical and Normal Samples." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , LXV (1962), 285-299.
15.
Loevinger, Jane. "Theory and Techniques of Assessment." Annual Review of Psychology, X (1959), 287-316.
16.
McGee, R. K. "The Relationship between Response Style and Personality Variables: I. The Measurement of Response Acquiescence ." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LXIV (1962), 229-233. (a)
17.
McGee, R. K. "The Relationship between Response Style and Personality Variables: II. The Prediction of Independent Conformity Behavior." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , LXV (1962), 347-351. (b)
18.
McGee, R. K. "Response Style as a Personality Variable: By What Criterion?" Psychological Bulletin, LIX (1962), 284-295. (c)
19.
Messick, S. and Jackson, D. N. "Acquiescence and the Factorial Interpretation of the MMPI." Psychological Bulletin, LVIII (1961), 299-305.
20.
Neprash, J. A. "Reliability of Questions in the Thurstone Personality Schedule." Journal of Social Psychology , VII (1936), 239-244.
21.
Peabody, D. "Attitude Content and Agreement Set in Scales of Authoritarianism, Dogmatism, Antisemitism, and Economic Conservatism." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , LXIII (1961), 1-11.
22.
Rorer, L. G. "The Function of Item Content in MMPI Responses." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1963.
23.
Rorer, L. G. "The Great Response Style Myth ." Psychological Review, LXIII (1965), 129-156.
24.
Schofield, W. S. "MMPI Changes with Certain Therapies." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1948 .
25.
Siller, J. and Chipman, A. "Response Set Paralysis: Implications for Measurement and Control." American Psychologist, XVII (1962), 391. (Abstract)
