Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.The Authoritarian Personality . New York: Harper & Brothers , 1950.
2.
Ancona, L. "Indagine Sulla Natura Psichico del 'Response set.' La 'Motivazione al Successo'." Archivio di Psichologia,Neurologia e Psichiatria , XV (1954), 23-74.
3.
Bass, B. M. "Authoritarianism or Acquiescence?" Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , LI (1955), 611-623.
4.
Berg, I. A. "The Reliability of Extreme Position Response Sets in Two Tests." Journal of Psychology, XXXVI, (1953), 3-9.
5.
Berg, I. A. "Response Bias and Personality: The Deviation Hypothesis." Journal of Psychology , XL (1955), 61-72.
6.
Barnes, E. H. "The Relationship of Biased Test Responses to Psychopathology." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LI ( 1955), 286-290.
7.
Barnes, E. H. "Response Bias and the MMPI." Journal of Consulting Psychology, XX (1956), 371-374.
8.
Barnes, E. H. "Factors, Response Bias, and the MMPI." Journal of Consulting Psychology , XX (1956), 419-421.
9.
Campbell, D. T. "A Typology of Tests, Projective and Otherwise." Journal of Consulting Psychology, XXI (1957), 207-210.
10.
Chapman, L. J. and Campbell, D. T. "Response Set in the F Scale ." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LIV (1957), 129-132.
11.
Christie, R. "Authoritarianism Re-examined." In R. Christie and M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the Scope and Method of 'The Authoritarian Personality.' Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1954.
12.
Cronbach, L. J. "Response Sets and Test Validity." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , VI, (1946), 475-494.
13.
Cronbach, L. J. "Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, X ( 1950), 3-31.
14.
Edwards, A. L. "The Relationship Between the Judged Desirability of a Trait and the Probability That the Trait Will Be Endorsed." Journal of Applied Psychology, XXXVII (1953), 90-93.
15.
French, J. W. (Ed.) Kit of Selected Tests for Reference Aptitude and Achievement Factors. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service , 1954.
16.
Gage, N. L., Leavitt, G. S., and Stone, G. C. "The Psychological Meaning of Acquiescence Set for Authoritarianism ." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LV (1957), 98-103.
17.
Hanley, C. "Social Desirability and Responses to Items from Three MMPI Scales: D, Sc, and K." Journal of Applied Psychology, XL ( 1956), 324-328.
18.
Helmstadter, G. C. "Procedures for Obtaining Separate Set and Content Components of a Test Score." Psychometrika, XXII ( 1957),381-393.
19.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S. J. "A Note on Ethnocentrism and Acquiescent Response Sets." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LIV (1957), 132-134.
20.
Jackson, D. N. and Messick, S. J. "Content and Style in Personality Assessment ." Psychological Bulletin, LV (1958), 243-252.
21.
Jackson, D. N., Messick, S. J., and Solley, C. M. "How 'Rigid' is the 'Authoritarian'?" Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LIV (1957 ), 137-140.
22.
Leavitt, H. J., Hax, H., and Roche, J. H. "' Authoritarianism' and Agreement with Things Authoritative ." Journal of Psychology, XL ( 1955 ), 215-221.
23.
Lentz, T. F. "Acquiescence As a Factor in the Measurement of Personality." Psychological Bulletin, XXV (1938), 659. (Abstract).
24.
Lorge, I. "Gen-like: Halo or Reality?" Psychological Bulletin, XXXIV (1937), 545-546.
25.
Messick, S. J., and Frederiksen, N. "Ability, Acquiescence, and 'Authoritarianism'." Psychological Reports, IV (1958), 687-697.
26.
Messick, S. J. and Jackson, D. N. "The Measurement of Authoritarian Attitudes ." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XVIII (1958), 241-253.
27.
Messick, S. J. and Jackson, D. N. "Authoritarianism or Acquiescence in Bass's Data." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , LIV (1957), 424-426.
28.
Mitzell, H. E., Rabinowitz, W., and Ostreicher, L. M. "The Effects of Response Sets on the Validity of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , XVI ( 1956) , 501-515.
29.
Osgood, C. E. "Ease of Individual Judgment Processes in Relation to Polarization of Attitudes in the Culture." Journal of Social Psychology, XIV (1941), 403-418.
30.
Rundquist, E. A. "Response Sets: A Note on Consistency in Taking Extreme Positions." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, X (1950), 97-99.
31.
Rundquist, E. A. and Sletto, R. F.Personality in the Depression . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1936.
32.
Saunders, D. R. "Some Preliminary Interpretive Material for the PRI." Research Memorandum 55-15 . Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service , 1955.
33.
Shelley, H. P. "Response Set and the California Attitude Scales." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XVI, ( 1956), 63-67.
34.
Thorndike, R. L. "Critical Note on the Pressey Interest-Attitudes Test." Journal of Applied Psychology, XXII (1938), 657-668.
35.
Vernon, P. E. "Classifying High Grade Occupational Interests." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, XLIV (1949), 85-96.
36.
Whisler, L. D. " 'Reliability' of Scores on Attitude Scales as Related to Scoring Method." In H. H. Remmers (Ed.), Further Studies in Attitudes, Series III. Studies in Higher Education, 34. Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University, 1938.