Baier E. "Reply to Travers' 'A Critical Review of the Validity and Rationale of the Forced-Choice Technique ."' Psychological Bulletin, XLVIII (1951), 421-434.
2.
Berkshire, J. R. and Highland, R. W. "Forced-Choice Performance Rating—A Methodological Study." Personnel Psychology , VI (1953), 356-378.
3.
Campbell, J. T. and Rundquist, E. A. "Scale Items for Inclusion in Forced-Choice Rating Forms." American Psychologist, V (1950), 280.
4.
Foreman, C. W. L. "Inventory, Planning, and Development of the Management Organization." Personnel, XXVII (1951), 267-276.
5.
Harding, F. D. and Long, W. F. "Development of a Forced-Choice Rating Scale for Evaluation of Classroom Instructors." Research Bulletin 52-21. Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas: Human Resources Research Center, June, 1952.
6.
Highland, R. W. and Berkshire, J. R. "A Methodological Study of Forced-Choice Performance Rating." Research Bulletin 51-9. Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas: Human Resources Research Center , May, 1951.
7.
Lanman, R. W. and Remmers, H. H. "The 'Preference' and 'Discrimination' Indices in Forced-Choice Scales." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , XIV (1954), 541-551.
8.
Mauk, Gertrude.The Development of a Forced-Choice Supervisory Performance Within a Large Automotive Corporation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Wayne University, 1951.
9.
Radom, M. "Picking Better Foremen." Factory Management and Maintenance, October, 1950.
10.
Richardson, M. W. "Forced-Choice Performance Reports: A Modern Merit-Rating Method." Personnel , XXVI (1949), 205-212.
11.
Runyon, E. L. and Stromberg, E. L. "A Forced-Choice Evaluation Form for Clinical Psychology Practicum Students." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XIII ( 1953), 170-178.
12.
Seeley, L. C. "Construction of Three Measures for Instructor Evaluation." Technical Report—SDC 383-1-5, Office of Naval Research, July 20, 1948.
13.
Sisson, E. D. "Forced-Choice—The New Army Rating." Personnel Psychology, I (1948), 365-381.
14.
Sparks, C. P. and Edgerton, H. A.Evaluating Leadership Potential of Pre-Flight Navcads. Richardson, Bellows, Henry and Company, March 31, 1951.
15.
Sparks, C. P. and Jack, O. C.Survey of Supervisors' Performance Report 1949-1950-1951 . Richardson, Bellows, Henry and Company.
16.
Staff, Personnel Research Section, AGO. "Determination of Preference and Discrimination Values of Phrases for Forced-Choice Check Lists of Officer Efficiency Report Forms." PRS Report No. 846.
17.
Staugas, L. and Mc Quitty, L. L. "A New Application of Forced-Choice Ratings ." Personnel Psychology, III (1950), 413-424.
18.
Taylor, E. K., Schneider, Dorothy E., and Symons, Nancy A. "A Short Forced-Choice Evaluation Form for Salesmen ." Personnel Psychology, VI (1953), 393-401.
