Berg, I. A. "The Reliability of Extreme Position Response Sets in Two Tests." Journal of Psychology, XXXVI (1953), 3-9.
2.
Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. Experimental Designs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1950.
3.
Cook, W. W., and Hoyt, C. J. "Procedure for Determining Number and Nature of Norm Groups for the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XII (1952), 562-573.
4.
Cook, W. W., Leeds, C. H. , and Callis, R.Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1951.
5.
Cook, W. W., and Medley, D. M. "The Relationship between Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory Scores and Scores on Certain Scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory." Journal of Applied Psychology, XXXIX (1955), 123-129.
6.
Cronbach, L. J. "Response Sets and Test Validity." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , VI (1946), 475-494.
7.
Cronbach, L. J. "Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, X (1950), 3-31.
8.
Ferguson, J. L., Brown, K. B., and Callis, R.Factor Analysis of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory. Office of Naval Research, Technical Report, No. 4, Contract NONR 649(∞), 1954.
9.
Fisher, R. A., and Yates, F.Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural, and Medical Research. 3rd Edition, New York: Hafner, 1948.
10.
Meehl, P. E., and Hathaway, S. R. "The K Factor as a Suppressor Variable in Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory." Journal of Applied Psychology, XXX (1946), 525-564.
11.
Mitzel, H. E.Interest Factors Predictive of Teachers' Rapport with Pupils. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota Library, Minneapolis, Minnesota , 1952.
12.
Rabinowitz, W. "The Fakability of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XIV ( 1954), 657-664.
13.
Tanner, W. C. "Personality Bases in Teacher Selection." Phi Delta Kappan, XXXV (1954), 271-274, 277.