A Comparison of the Forced and Unforced Q-Sorting Procedures

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cronbach, L. J. "Further Evidence on Response-Sets and Test Design." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, X (1950 ), 3-31.

Cronbach, L. J. , and Gleser, Goldine C. "Assessing Similarity between Profiles ." Psychological Bulletin, L (1953), 456-473.

Dixon, W. J. , and Massey, F. J. , Jr. Introduction to Statistical Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1951.

Ferguson, G. A. "On the Theory of Test Discrimination." Psychometrika, XIV (1949), 61-68.

Hinckley, E. D. "The Influence of Individual Opinion on Construction of an Attitude Scale." Journal of Social Psychology, III (1932), 283-296.

Hovland, C. I. , and Sherif, M. "Judgmental Phenomena and Scales of Attitude Measurement: Item Displacement in Thurstone Scales." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, XLVII (1952), 822-833.

Livson, N. , and Nichols, T. "Discrimination and Reliability in Q-Sort Personality Description." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, in press.

Polansky, N. A. "How Shall a Life History be Written?" Character and Personality, IX (1941), 188-207.

Sherif, M. , and Hovland, C. I. "Judgmental Phenomena and Scales of Attitude Measurement: Placement of Items with Individual Choice of Number of Categories ." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, XLVIII (1953), 135-141.

10.

Stephenson, W. The Study of Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.

11.

Valentine, C. W. "The Relative Reliability of Men and Women in Intuitive Judgments of Character." British Journal of Psychology, XIX ( 1929), 213-238.