Bristor, Boisel. "Subject Failures." National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, XXX (1946), 146-148.
2.
Callis, Robert. "Change in Teacher-Pupil Attitudes Related to Training and Experience." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , X (1950), 718-727.
3.
Callis, Robert. "The Efficiency of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory for Predicting Interpersonal Relations in the Classroom." Journal of Applied Psychology, XXXVII (1953), 82-85.
4.
Cook, Walter W. and Hoyt, Cyril J. "Procedure for Determining Number and Nature of Norm Groups for the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory ." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, XII (1952), 562-573.
5.
Cook, Walter W. and Leeds, Carroll H. "Measuring the Teaching Personality ." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , VII (1947), 399-410.
6.
Cook, Walter W., Leeds, Carroll H. and Callis, Robert.The Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory, Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1951.
7.
Farnsworth, B.K. and Casper, J.B. "A Study of Pupil Failure in High School ." School Review, IL ( 1941), 380-383.
8.
Leeds, Carroll H. "A Second Validity Study of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory." Elementary School Journal, LII (1952), 398-405.
9.
Leeds, Carroll H. and Cook, Walter W. "The Construction and Differential Value of a Scale for Determining Teacher-Pupil Attitudes." Journal of Experimental Education, XVI (1947), 149-159.
10.
Norsted, R.A. "To Mark or Not to Mark?" Journal of Education, CXXI (1938), 81-84.
11.
Rocchio, Patrick D. "Teacher-Pupil Attitudes as Related to Teachers' Personal Characteristics and Pupil Adjustment." Unpublished Doctor's dissertation. University of Minnesota, 1934.
12.
Sandin, Adolph A.Social and Emotional Adjustment of Regularly Promoted and Nonpromoted Pupils . New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1944.
13.
Schinnerer, M.C. "Failure Ratio: 2 Boys to I Girl." Clearing House, XVIII ( 1944), 264-270.