Anderhalter, O. F., Wilkins, W. L., and Rigby, Marilyn K.Peer Ratings. Technical Report # 2, prepared at St. Louis University under Office of Naval Research Contract N7 onr-40802 (NR I5I-092, 1952.
2.
Baier, D. E.Reply to Traver's "A Critical Review of the Validity and Rationale of the Forced-Choice Technique."Psychological Bulletin, XLVIII (1951), 421-434.
3.
French, J. W."A Technique for Criterion-Keying and Selecting Test Items."Psychometrika , XVII (1952), 101-106.
4.
Gulliksen, H."Item Selection to Maximize Test Validity."Proceedings of the I948 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton: The Educational Testing Service, 1949.
5.
Horst, A. P."Item Selection by Means of a Maximizing Function."Psychometrika, I (1936), 229-244.
6.
McClure, G. E., Tupes, E. C., and Dailey, J. T.Research on Criteria of Officer Effectiveness. HRRC Research Bulletin, 5I-8 , San Antonio: Lackland AFB, 1951.
7.
Rohrer, J. H., Bagby, J. W., Jr., and Wilkins, W. L.The Potential Combat Officer. A technical report to the Neuropsychiatry Branch , Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Navy, Washington, 1952.
8.
Wherry, R. J. and Fryer, D. H."Buddy Ratings: Popularity Contest or Leadership Criteria?"Personnel Psychology, II (1949), 147-159.
9.
White, R."Value Analysis: A Quantitative Method for Describing Qualitative Data."Journal of Social Psychology, XIX (1944 ), 351-358.
10.
Williams, S. B. and Leavitt, H. J."Group Opinion as a Predictor of Military Leadership."Journal of Consulting Psychology , XI (1947), 283-292.
