Barr, A. S. "Measurement of Teaching Ability: Impressions, Trends, Future Research." Journal of Experimental Education , XIV (1946), 200- 206.
2.
Bendig, A. W. "The Use of Student-Rating Scales in the Evaluation of Instructors in Introductory Psychology ." Journal of Educational Psychology , XLIII (1952), 167-175.
3.
Bendig, A. W. "A Preliminary Study of the Effect of Academic Level, Sex, and Course Variables on Student Rating of Psychology Instructors." Journal of Psychology , XXXIV (1952), 21-26.
4.
Bendig, A. W. "A Statistical Report on a Revision of the Miami Instructor Rating Sheet." Journal of Educational Psychology , XLIII (1952), 423- 429.
5.
Bendig, A. W. "The Reliability of Letter Grades." EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , XIII (1953), 311-321.
6.
Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M.Experimental Designs. New York: Wiley, 1950.
7.
Crannell, C. W. "An Experiment in the Rating of Instructors by Their Students." College and University , XXIII (1948), 5-II.
8.
Edwards, A. L.Experimental Design in Psychological Research. New York: Rinehart, 1950, 197-198.
9.
Lancelot, W. H. "Standards of Measurement of Teaching Ability." School and Society , XXXIV (1931), 236-238.
10.
Martin, F. D., Alberts, A. A., Remmers, H. H., and Hobson, R. L.The Purdue Rating Scale for Laboratory and Recitation Instructors in General Chemistry . Lafayette, Indiana: Bureau of Educational Reference, Purdue University.
11.
Remmers, H. H., Martin, F. D., and Elliott, D. N. "Are Student Ratings of Their Instructors Related to Their Grades ." Purdue University Studies in Higher Education , LXVI (1949 ), 17-26.
12.
Stevens, S. S. (Ed.) Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York : Wiley, 1951, 27-28.