A new alternative to obtain a Bayesian estimate of coefficient alpha through a posterior normal distribution is proposed and assessed through percentile, normal-theory-based, and highest probability density credible intervals in a simulation study. The results indicate that the proposed Bayesian method to estimate coefficient alpha has acceptable coverage probability performance across the majority of investigated simulation conditions.
AndersonA. A. (2019). Assessing statistical results: Magnitude, precision, and model uncertainty. The American Statistician, 73, 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1537889
2.
BarchardK. A.HakstianA. R. (1997). The robustness of confidence intervals for coefficient alpha under violation of the assumption of essential parallelism. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_4
3.
Beaulieu-PrevostD. (2006). Confidence intervals: From tests of statistical significance to confidence intervals, range hypotheses, and substantial effects. Tutorials in Quantitativve Methods for Psychology, 2(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.02.1.p011
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
7.
DerogatisL. R.LipmanR. S.RickelsK.UhlenhuthE. H.CoviL. (1974). The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830190102
8.
DuhachekA.IacobucciD. (2004). Alpha’s standard error (ASE): An accurate and precise confidence interval estimate. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.792
9.
FeldtL. S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty. Psychometrika, 30(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289499
10.
FurrR. M.BacharachV. R. (2014). Psychometrics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.
11.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.DunsonD. B.VehtariA.RubinD. B. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
12.
GerlitzJ.SchuppJ. (2005). Zur erhebung der big-five-basierten persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP [Assessment of big five personality characteristics in the SOEP]. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
13.
HahnE.GottschlingJ.SpinathF. (2012). Short measurements of personality—Validity and reliability of the GSOEP big five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008
14.
LeeP. M. (2004). Bayesian statistics: An introduction (3rd ed.). Arnold.
15.
LynchS. M. (2007). Introduction to applied Bayesian statistics and estimation for social scientists. Springer.
16.
MarcoulidesK. M. (2018). Careful with those priors: A note on bayesian estimation in two-parameter logistic item response theory models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 16(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2018.1437305
17.
Maydeu-OlivaresA.CoffmanD. L.HartmannW. M. (2007). Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.157
18.
NovickM. R. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289400
19.
PadillaM. A. (2019). A primer on reliability via coefficient alpha and omega. Archives of Psychology, 3(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31296/aop.v3i8.125
PadillaM. A.ZhangG. (2011). Estimating internal consistency using Bayesian methods. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10(1), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1304223840
22.
RaykovT.AnthonyJ. C.MenoldN. (2023). On the importance of coefficient alpha for measurement research: Loading equality is not necessary for Alpha’s utility as a scale reliability index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(4), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644221104972
23.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A.AnthonyJ.MenoldN. (2024). Evaluating Cronbach’s coefficient alpha and testing its identity to scale reliabiltiy: A direct Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis procedure. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 22(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2023.2201963
24.
RomanoJ. L.KromreyJ. D.HibbardS. T. (2010). A Monte Carlo study of eight confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355690
25.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
26.
van ZylJ. M.NeudeckerH.NelD. G. (2000). On the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 65(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296146
YuanK. H.GuarnacciaC. A.HayslipB.Jr. (2003). A study of the distribution of sample coefficient alpha with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist: Bootstrap versus asymptotics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402239314
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
