The multidimensional mixture data structure exists in many test (or inventory) conditions. Heterogeneity also relatively exists in populations. Still, some researchers are interested in deciding to which subpopulation a participant belongs according to the participant’s factor pattern. Thus, in this study, we proposed three analysis procedures based on the factor mixture model to analyze data in the multidimensional mixture context. Simulations were manipulated with different levels of factor numbers, factor correlations, numbers of latent classes, and class separation. Issues with regard to model selection were discussed at first. The results showed that in the two-class situations the procedures of “factor structure first then class number” (Procedure 1) and “factor structure and class number considered simultaneously” (Procedure 3) performed better than the “class number first then factor structure” (Procedure 2) and yielded precise parameter estimation and classification accuracy. It would be appropriate to choose Procedures 1 and 3 when strong measurement invariance is assumed while using an information criterion, but Procedure 1 saved more time than Procedure 3. In the three-class situations, the performance of all three procedures was limited. Implementations and suggestions have been addressed in this research.
AllanN. P.RainesA. M.CapronD. W.NorrA. M.ZvolenskyM. J.SchmidtN. B. (2014). Identification of anxiety sensitivity classes and clinical cut-scores in a sample of adult smokers: Results from a factor mixture model. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28, 696–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.07.006
4.
ArmingerG.SteinP.WittenbergJ. (1999). Mixtures of conditional mean- and covariance-structure models. Psychometrika, 64(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294568
5.
BacciS.BartolucciF.GnaldiM. (2014). A class of multidimensional latent class IRT models for ordinal polytomous item responses. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 43(4), 787–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2013.827718
6.
BartolucciF. (2007). A class of multidimensional IRT models for testing unidimensionality and clustering items. Psychometrika, 72, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1376-9
7.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1978). Objective personality assessment. In StorandtM.SieglerI. C.EliasM. F. (Eds.), The clinical psychology of aging (pp. 119–143). Plenum.
8.
De BoeckP.ChoS. J.WilsonM. (2011). Explanatory secondary dimension modeling of latent differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(8), 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621611428446
9.
DolanC. V.van der MaasH. L. J. (1998). Fitting multivariate normal finite mixtures subject to structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 63(3), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294853
10.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
11.
FinchW. H.FinchM. E. H. (2013). Investigation of specific learning disability and testing accommodations based differential item functioning using a multilevel multidimensional mixture item response theory model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413494776
12.
HensonJ. M.ReiseS. P.KimK. H. (2007). Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336744
13.
JedidiK.JagpalH. S.DeSarboW. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.16.1.39
14.
LinY. H.WilsonM. (2013). Two IRT methods for multidimensional latent class parameter estimation. Tzu-Chi University Journal of the Educational Research, 9, 223–254.
15.
LitsonK.GeiserC.BurnsG. L.ServeraM. (2017). Examining trait×method interactions using mixture distribution multitrait-multimethod models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1238307
LubkeG. H.MuthénB. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
18.
LubkeG. H.MuthénB. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336735
19.
LubkeG. H.NealeM. C. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 499–532. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_4
20.
McDonaldS. R. (2013). Identification of latent classes in mixture models: A Monte Carlo simulation study [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside].
21.
MislevyR. J.VerhelstN. (1990). Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika, 55, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295283
MuthénB. (2008). Latent variable hybrids: Overview of old and new models. In HancockG. R.SamuelsenK. M. (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 1–24). Information Age Publishing.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.).
26.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
27.
RostJ. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169001400305
ScloveL. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360
30.
ThurstoneL. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis: A development and expansion of vectors of the mind. University of Chicago Press.
31.
von DavierM.RostJ.CarstensenC. H. (2007). Introduction: Extending the Rasch model. In von DavierM.CarstensenC. H. (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models: Extensions and applications (pp. 1–12). Springer.
32.
YangC. C. (2006). Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 50(4), 1090–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.004
