Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which class-specific parameter estimates are biased by the within-class normality assumption in nonnormal growth mixture modeling (GMM). Monte Carlo simulations for nonnormal GMM were conducted to analyze and compare two strategies for obtaining unbiased parameter estimates: relaxing the within-class normality assumption and using data transformation on repeated measures. Based on unconditional GMM with two latent trajectories, data were generated under different sample sizes (300, 800, and 1500), skewness (0.7, 1.2, and 1.6) and kurtosis (2 and 4) of outcomes, numbers of time points (4 and 8), and class proportions (0.5:0.5 and 0.25:0.75). Of the four distributions, it was found that skew-t GMM had the highest accuracy in terms of parameter estimation. In GMM based on data transformations, the adjusted logarithmic method was more effective in obtaining unbiased parameter estimates than the use of van der Waerden quantile normal scores. Even though adjusted logarithmic transformation in nonnormal GMM reduced computation time, skew-t GMM produced much more accurate estimation and was more robust over a range of simulation conditions. This study is significant in that it considers different levels of kurtosis and class proportions, which has not been investigated in depth in previous studies. The present study is also meaningful in that investigated the applicability of data transformation to nonnormal GMM.

Keywords

nonnormal growth mixture modeling data transformation unbiased parameter estimate Monte Carlo simulation study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agresti

Finlay

(2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Asparouhov

Muthén

B. O.

(2016). Structural equation models and mixture models with continuous nonnormal skewed distributions. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.947375

Azzalini

Valle

A. D.

(1996). The multivariate skew-normal distribution. Biometrika, 83, 715-726. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/83.4.715

Bandalos

D. L.

(2006). The use of Monte Carlo studies in structural equation modeling research. In Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 385-462). Information Age.

Bauer

D. J.

(2007). Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(4), 757-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701710338

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 338-363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.3

Boers

Reinecke

Seddig

Mariotti

(2010). Explaining the development of adolescent violent delinquency. European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810376572

10.

Brandt

Klein

A. G.

(2015). A heterogeneous growth curve model for nonnormal data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(4), 416-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1022639

11.

D’Amico

E. J.

Tucker

J. S.

Miles

J. N.

Ewing

B. A.

Shih

R. A.

Pedersen

E. R.

(2016). Alcohol and marijuana use trajectories in a diverse longitudinal sample of adolescents: Examining use patterns from age 11 to 17 years. Addiction, 111(10), 1825-1835. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13442

12.

Depaoli

Winter

S. D.

Lai

Guerra-Peña

(2019). Implementing continuous non-normal skewed distributions in latent growth mixture modeling: An assessment of specification errors and class enumeration. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(6), 795-821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1593813

13.

Fan

Felsővályi

Á.

Sivo

S. A.

Keenan

S. C.

(2002). SAS for Monte Carlo studies: A guide for quantitative researchers. SAS Institute.

14.

Feldman

B. J.

Masyn

K. E.

Conger

R. D.

(2009). New approaches to studying problem behaviors: A comparision of methods for modeling longitudinal, categorical adolescent drinking data. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 652-676. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014851

15.

Feng

Wang

X. M.

(2013). Log transformation: Application and interpretation in biomedical research. Statistics in Medicine, 32(2), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5486

16.

Finch

J. F.

West

S. G.

MacKinnon

D. P.

(1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540063

17.

Fleishman

(1978). A method for simulating non-normal distributions. Psychometrika, 43(4), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293811

18.

Flora

D. B.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466

19.

Frühwirth-Schnatter

Pyne

(2010). Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of univariate and multivariate skew-normal and skew-t distributions. Biostatistics, 11(2), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxp062

20.

Guerra-Peña

Steinley

(2016). Extracting spurious latent classes in growth mixture modeling with nonnormal errors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 933-953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416633735

21.

Jung

Wickrama

K. A. S.

(2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x

22.

Kaplan

(1988). The impact of specification error on the estimation, testing and improvement of structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_4

23.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Data preparation and psychometrics review. In Principle and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed., pp. 64-96). Guilford Press.

24.

Kupek

(2005). Log-linear transformation of binary variables: A suitable input for SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_2

25.

Lee

McLachlan

G. J.

(2014). Finite mixtures of multivariate skew t-distributions: Some recent and new results. Statistics and Computing, 24(2), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-012-9362-4

26.

Lin

T. I.

Lee

J. C.

Hsieh

W. J.

(2007). Robust mixture modeling using the skew-t distribution. Statistics and Computing, 17(2), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-006-9005-8

27.

Mendell

N. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767-778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767

28.

Huang

(2014). Bayesian analysis of nonlinear mixed-effects mixture models for longitudinal data with heterogeneity and skewness. Statistics in Medicine, 33(16), 2701-2880. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6136

29.

McLachlan

G. J.

Peel

(2000). Finite mixture models. Wiley.

30.

Morgan

G. B.

Hodge

K. J.

Baggett

A. R.

(2016). Latent profile analysis with nonnormal mixtures: A Monte Carlo examination of model selection using fit indices. Computational Statistics & Data Analytics, 93, 146-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2015.02.019

31.

Muthén

B. O.

(2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In Kaplan

(Eds.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345-368). Sage.

32.

Muthén

B. O.

Asparouhov

(2015). Growth mixture modeling with non-normal distributions. Statistics in Medicine, 34(6), 1041-1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6388

33.

Muthén

B. O.

Muthén

L. K.

(1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/MplusUserGuideVer_8.pdf

34.

Muthén

B. O.

Muthén

L. K.

(2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x

35.

National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). National educational longitudinal study of 1998. U.S. Department of Education.

36.

Schwartz

(1978). Estimating dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

37.

Sclove

S. L.

(1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems analysis, Psychometrika, 52(3), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360

38.

Svolba

(2006). Data mart coding and content. In Data preparation for analytics: Using SAS (pp. 105-160). SAS Institute.

39.

Son

Lee

Jang

Yang

Hong

(2019). A comparison of different nonnormal distributions in growth mixture models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(3), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418823865

40.

Stanley

Kellermanns

F. W.

Zellweger

T. M.

(2017). Latent profile analysis: Understanding family firm profiles. Family Business Review, 30(1), 84-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516677426

41.

Vale

Maurelli

(1983). Simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions. Psychometrika, 48(3), 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293687

42.

van der Waerden

B. L

. (1952). Order tests for the two-sample problem and their power. Indagationes Mathematicae, 14, 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-7258(52)50063-5

43.

Wickrama

K. A. S.

Lee

T. K.

O’Neal

C. W.

Lorenz

F. O.

(2016). An introduction to growth mixture models (GMMs). In Higher-order growth curves mixture modeling with Mplus: A practical guide (pp. 209-226). Routledge.

44.

Yuan

K. H.

Chan

Bentler

P. M.

(2000). Robust transformation with applications to structural equation modelling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711000159169

Growth Mixture Modeling With Nonnormal Distributions: Implications for Data Transformation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References