Do Two or More Multicomponent Instruments Measure the Same Construct? Testing Construct Congruence Using Latent Variable Modeling

Abstract

A latent variable modeling procedure is discussed that can be used to test if two or more homogeneous multicomponent instruments with distinct components are measuring the same underlying construct. The method is widely applicable in scale construction and development research and can also be of special interest in construct validation studies. The approach can be readily utilized in empirical settings with observed measure nonnormality and/or incomplete data sets. The procedure is based on testing model nesting restrictions, and it can be similarly employed to examine the collapsibility of latent variables evaluated by multidimensional measuring instruments. The outlined method is illustrated with two data examples.

Keywords

congruence construct latent variable modeling multidimensionality nested models unidimensionality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apostol

T. M.

(2013). Calculus. New York, NY: Wiley.

Baltes

P. B.

Dittmann-Kohli

Kliegl

(1986). Reserve capacity of the elderly in aging-sensitive tasks of fluid intelligence: Replication and extension. Psychology and Aging, 1, 172-177.

Bollen

K. A.

(1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

Enders

C. K.

(2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.

Graham

J. W.

(2003). Adding missing-data relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 80-100.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real work. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-575.

Horn

J. L.

(1982). The aging of human abilities. In Wolman

B. B.

(Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 847-870). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

L.-T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

Jöreskog

K. G.

(1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.

10.

Muthén

B. O.

(2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81-117.

11.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2014). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

12.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

(2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

13.

Raykov

Marcoulides

G. A.

(2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

14.

Raykov

Marcoulides

G. A.

(2012). Basic statistics: An introduction with R. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.