Unrestricted Mixture Models for Class Identification in Growth Mixture Modeling

Abstract

Growth mixture modeling has gained much attention in applied and methodological social science research recently, but the selection of the number of latent classes for such models remains a challenging issue, especially when the assumption of proper model specification is violated. The current simulation study compared the performance of a linear growth mixture model (GMM) for determining the correct number of latent classes against a completely unrestricted multivariate normal mixture model. Results revealed that model convergence is a serious problem that has been underestimated by previous GMM studies. Based on two ways of dealing with model nonconvergence, the performance of the two types of mixture models and a number of model fit indices in class identification are examined and discussed. This article provides suggestions to practitioners who want to use GMM for their research.

Keywords

growth mixture models model convergence class identification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

A’Hearn

B. A.

Komlos

(2003). Improvements in maximum likelihood estimators of truncated normal samples with prior knowledge of σ. A simulation based study with application to historical height samples. Unpublished Working Paper, University of Munich, Germany.

Akaike

(1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.

Azzalini

(1985). A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 12, 171-178.

Azzalini

(2005). The skew-normal distribution and related multivariate families. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 32, 159-188.

Bauer

D. J.

(2007). Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 757-786.

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for the overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338-363.

Bauer

D. J.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3-29.

Bozdogan

(1987). Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.

Celeux

Soromenho

(1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195-212.

10.

Chang

(2005). Bayesian inference on mixture models and their applications (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://repository.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/3990/etd-tamu-2005A-STAT-Chan.pdf?sequence=1

11.

Chen

(1995). Optimal rate of convergence in finite mixture models. Annals of Statistics, 23, 221-233.

12.

Chen

Kwok

Luo

Willson

(2010). The impact of ignoring a level of nesting structure in multilevel growth mixture models: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 570-589.

13.

Draper

(1995). Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 45-97.

14.

Douglas

Liu

(2009, June). Different trajectories in learning to read in U.S. elementary schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Boston, MA.

15.

Geman

Bienenstock

Doursat

(1992). Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4, 1-58.

16.

Greenbaum

P. E.

Del Boca

F. K.

Darkes

Wang

C.-P.

Goldman

M. S.

(2005). Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshman college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 229-238.

17.

Grimm

K. J.

Ram

(2009). A second-order growth mixture model for developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6, 121-143.

18.

Hamilton

(2009). An investigation of growth mixture models when data are collected with unequal selection probabilities: A Monte Carlo study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1903/9613

19.

Hannan

E. J.

Quinn

B. G.

(1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 41, 190-195.

20.

Henson

J. M.

Reise

S. P.

Kim

K. H.

(2007). Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 202-226.

21.

Hipp

J. R.

Bauer

D. J.

(2006). Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 11, 36-53.

22.

Hurvich

C. M.

Tsai

C. L.

(1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76, 297-307.

23.

Kreuter

Muthén

(2008a). Analyzing criminal trajectory profiles: Bridging multilevel and group-based approaches using growth mixture modeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 1-31.

24.

Kreuter

Muthén

(2008b). Longitudinal modeling of population heterogeneity: Methodological challenges to the analysis of empirically derived criminal trajectory profiles. In Hancock

G. R.

Samuelsen

K. M.

(Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 53-75). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

25.

Mendell

N. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767-778.

26.

McLachlan

G. J.

(1987). On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture. Applied Statistics, 36, 318-324.

27.

McLachlan

G. J.

Peel

(2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.

28.

Muthén

Asparouhov

(2008). Growth mixture modeling: Analysis with non-Gaussian random effects. In Fitzmaurice

Davidian

Verbeke

Molenberghs

(Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis (pp. 143-165). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

29.

Muthén

Brown

C. H.

Hunter

Cook

I. A.

Leuchter

A. F.

(2011). General approaches to analysis of course: Applying growth mixture modeling to randomized trials of depression medication. In Shrout

P. E.

(Ed.), Causality and psychopathology: Finding the determinants of disorders and their cures (pp. 159-178). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

30.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2001). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

31.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2008). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

32.

Nylund

K. L.

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535-569.

33.

Pastor

D. A.

Gagné

(2013). Mean and covariance structure mixture models. In Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

34.

Peugh

Fan

(2012). How well does growth mixture modeling identify heterogeneous growth trajectories? A simulation study examining GMM’s performance characteristics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 204-226.

35.

Ramaswamy

DeSarbo

W. S.

Reibstein

D. J.

Robinson

W. T.

(1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103-124.

36.

Rice

Lumley

Szpiro

(2008). Trading bias for precision: Decision theory for intervals and sets (UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 336). Seattle: University of Washington.

37.

Schwarz

(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.

38.

Sclove

L. S.

(1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrics, 52, 333-343.

39.

Stoolmiller

Kim

H. K.

Capaldi

D. M.

(2005). The course of depressive symptoms in men from early adolescence to young adulthood: Identifying latent trajectories and early predictors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 331-345.

40.

Tofighi

Enders

C. K.

(2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in a growth mixture model. In Hancock

G. R.

Samuelsen

K. M.

(Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317-341). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

41.

Tolvanen

(2007). Latent growth mixture modeling: A simulation study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Jyvaskyla. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/rep111.pdf

42.

Tueller

Lubke

(2010). Evaluation of structural equation mixture models: Parameter estimates and correct class assignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 165-192.

43.

Yang

C. C.

Yang

C. C.

(2007). Separating latent classes by information criteria. Journal of Classification, 24, 183-203.

44.

Yung

Y. F.

(1997). Finite mixtures in confirmatory factor-analysis models. Psychometrika, 62, 297-330.