A procedure for examining essential unidimensionality in multicomponent measuring instruments is discussed. The method is based on an application of latent variable modeling and is concerned with the extent to which a common factor for all components of a given scale accounts for their correlations. The approach provides point and interval estimates of the proportion of observed measures interrelationships that is explained by the common factor, the proportion explained by possible additional factors, and of the difference in these two proportions. The procedure is readily used in empirical research using the popular software Mplus and is illustrated with a numerical example.
BartholomewD. J.KnottM.MoustakiI. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis. A unified approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
2.
BrowneM. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In HawkinsD. M. (Ed.), Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72-141). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (1992). Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
6.
LittleR. J.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
MarshH. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361.
8.
MarshH. W.BaileyM. (1991). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47-70.
9.
MarshH. W.ByrneB. M.CravenR. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor analyses of MTMM data: The correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 489-507.
10.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
11.
MuthénB. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115-132.
12.
MuthénB. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 87-117.
RaykovT. (2001). Testing multivariable covariance structure and means hypotheses via structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 224-257.
15.
RaykovT. (2012). Scale construction and development using structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 472-492). New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2004). Using the delta method for approximate interval estimation of parametric functions in covariance structure models. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 659-675.
17.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
19.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
20.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2012). Basic statistics. An introduction with R. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
RaykovT.PohlS. (2012). On studying common factor variance in multiple component measuring instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013164412458673
22.
SpearmanC. (1904). “General intelligence” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 5, 201-293.
23.
StankovL.RaykovT. (1995). Modeling complexity and difficulty in fluid intelligence tasks. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 335-366.
24.
StaudingerU. M.GlückJ. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215-241.
25.
VenablesW. N.SmithD. M., & The R Development Core Team. (2012). An introduction to R. Bristol, England: Network Theory.
