This study investigates the relationship between the five decision-making styles evaluated by the General Decision-Making Style Inventory, indecisiveness, and rationality in decision making. Using a sample of 102 middle-level managers, the results show that the rational style positively predicts rationality in decision making and negatively predicts indecisiveness, whereas the avoidant style positively predicts indecisiveness.
CrossleyC. D.HighhouseS. (2005). Relation of job search and choice process with subsequent satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 255-268.
2.
CurşeuP. L. (2006). Need for cognition and rationality in decision making. Studia Psychologica, 48, 141-156.
3.
CurşeuP. L. (2011). Need for cognition and active information search in small student groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 415-418.
4.
de BruinW. B.ParkerA. M.FischhoffB. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
5.
GalottiK. M.CinerE.AltenbaumerH. E.GeertsH. J.RuppA.WoulfeJ. (2006). Decision-making styles in real life decisions: Choosing a college major. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 629-639.
6.
GalottiK. M.TinkelenbergC. E. (2009). Real-life decision making: Parents choosing a first-grade placement. American Journal of Psychology, 122, 455-468.
7.
LooR. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 895-905.
8.
ParkerA. M.de BruinW. B.FischhoffB. (2007). Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision making styles, competence and outcomes. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 342-350.
9.
ParkerA. M.FischhoffB. (2005). Decision-making competence: External validation through an individual-difference approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 1-27.
10.
RassinE.MurisP.BoosterE.KolslootI. (2008). Indecisiveness and informational tunnel vision. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 96-102.
11.
RyserG. R.CampbellH. L.MillerB. K. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the scales used for diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 844-857.
12.
Sadler-SmithE. (2011). The intuitive style: Relationships with local/global and verbal/visual styles, gender and superstitious reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 263-270.
13.
SagerK. L.GastilJ. (1999). Reaching consensus on consensus: A study of the relationships between individual decision-making styles and use of the consensus decision rule. Communication Quarterly, 47, 67-79.
14.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818-831.
15.
ShafirE.LeBoeufR. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491-517.
16.
Van ProoijenJ. W.Van Der KlootW. A. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of exploratively obtained factor structure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777-792.
17.
YuanK.-H.BentlerP. M. (2004). On chi-square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737-757.
