Considerable debate exists regarding the accuracy of intelligence tests with members of different groups. This study investigated differential predictive validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition. Participants from the WISC-IV—WIAT-II standardization linking sample (N = 550) ranged in age from 6 through 16 years (M = 11.6, SD = 3.2) and varied by the demographic variables of gender, race/ethnicity (Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic), and parent education level (8-11, 12, 13-15, and 16 years). Full Scale IQ and General Ability Index scores from the WISC-IV were used to predict scores on Mathematics, Oral Language, Reading, Written Language, and the total composite on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test—Second Edition. Differences in prediction were evaluated between demographic subgroups via Potthoff’s technique. Of the 30 simultaneous tests, 25 revealed no statistically significant between group differences. The remaining statistically significant differences were found to have little practical or clinical influence when effect size estimates were considered. Results are discussed in the context of other ability measures that were previously investigated for differential validity as well as educational implications for clinicians.
Alfonso, V.C., Oakland, T.D., LaRocca, R., & Spanakos, A. ( 2000). The course on individual cognitive assessment. School Psychology Review, 29, 52-64.
2.
Alfonso, V.C., & Pratt, S.I. ( 1997). Issues and suggestions for training professionals in assessing intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan , J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 326-347). New York: Guilford Press.
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
Belter, R.W., & Piotrowski, C. (2001). Current status of doctoral-level training in psychological testing. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 57, 717-726.
6.
Board of Scientific Affairs of the American Psychological Association. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns . American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
7.
Bossard, M.D., Reynolds, C.R., & Gutkin, T.B. ( 1980). A regression analysis of test bias on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale for Black and White children referred for psychological services. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 52-54.
8.
Bracken, B.A., & Walker, K.C. ( 1997). The utility of intelligence tests for preschool children . In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 484-502). New York: Guilford Press.
9.
Brody, N. ( 2002). g and the one-many problem: Is one enough? In G. R. Bock, J. A. Goode, & K. Webb (Eds.), Novartis Foundation Symposium 233: The nature of intelligence (pp. 122-135). New York: Wiley.
10.
Brown, R.T., Reynolds, C.R., & Whitaker, J.S. (1999). Bias in mental testing since bias in mental testing. School Psychology Quarterly , 14, 208-238.
11.
Canivez, G.L. ( 1998, August). Developing Cognitive Abilities Test (DCAT): Predictive Validity and Racial/Ethnic Bias. Paper presented at the Focus on Science Session at the 1998 Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
12.
Canivez, G.L. ( 1997). Developing Cognitive Ability Test (DCAT): Investigating psychometric characteristics and racial/ethnic bias. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association , Chicago.
13.
Canivez, G.L., & Konold, T.R. ( 2001). Assessing differential prediction bias in the Developing Cognitive Abilities Test across gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 159-171.
14.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. ( 1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
16.
Flanagan, D.P., Andrews, T.J., & Genshaft, J.L. (1997). The functional utility of intelligence tests with special education populations. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 457-483). New York: Guilford Press.
17.
Glutting, J.J. ( 1986). Potthoff bias analyses for K-ABC MPC and Nonverbal Scale IQs among Anglo, Black, and Puerto Rican kindergarten children. Professional School Psychology, 1, 225-234.
18.
Glutting, J.J., Oh, H.J., Ward, T., & Ward, S. ( 2000). Possible criterion-related bias of the WISC-III with a referral sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 18, 17-26.
19.
Glutting, J.J., Oakland, T., & Konold, T.R. ( 1994). Criterion-related bias with the Guide to the Assessment of Test-Session Behavior for the WISC-III and WIAT: Possible race, gender, and SES effects. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 355-369.
20.
Hale, R.L., Raymond, M.R., & Gajar, A.H. ( 1982). Evaluating socioeconomic status bias in the WISC-R. Journal of School Psychology, 20, 145-149.
21.
Hutton, J.B., Dubes, R., & Muir, S. ( 1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271-284.
22.
Jensen, A.R. ( 1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
23.
Kaufman, A.S., & Lichtenberger, E.O. (2000). Essentials of WISC-III and WPPSI-R assessment. New York: Wiley.
24.
Naglieri, J.A., & Bornstein, B.T. (2003). Intelligence and achievement: Just how correlated are they? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 244-260.
Oakland, T. (Ed.). (1977). Psychological and educational assessment of minority children. New York : Brunner/Mazel.
27.
Oakland, T., & Feigenbaum, D. (1979). Multiple sources of test bias on the WISC-R and Bender-Gestalt Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 968-974.
28.
Pfeiffer, S.I., Reddy, L.A., Kletzel, J.E., Schmelzer, E.R., & Boyer, L.M. ( 2000). The practitioner’s view of IQ testing and profile analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 376-385.
29.
Poteat, G.M., Wuensch, K.L., & Gregg, N.B. ( 1988). An investigation of differential prediction with the WISC-R. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 59-68.
30.
Potthoff, F.R. ( 1966). Statistical aspects of the problem of bias in psychological tests (Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 479). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Department of Statistics.
31.
Public Law (P.L.) 108-446. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA). (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.). 34 CFR Parts 300 and 301. Assistance to States for the education of children with disabilities and preschool grants for children with disabilities; Final Rule. Federal Register, 71(156), 46540-46845.
32.
Raiford, S.E., Rolfhus, E., Weiss, L.G., & Coalson, D. ( 2005). General ability index (WISC-IV Tech. Rep. No. 4). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
33.
Reynolds, C.R. ( 1982). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 178-208). New York: Wiley.
34.
Reynolds, C.R. ( 2000). Methods for detecting and evaluating cultural bias in neuropsychological tests. In F. Strickland & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology (pp. 249-285). New York: Plenum.
35.
Reynolds, C.R., & Gutkin, T.B. ( 1980). A regression analysis of test bias on the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred to psychological services. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 237-243.
36.
Reynolds, C.R., & Kaiser, S.M. ( 1990). Test bias in psychological assessment. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 847-525). New York: Wiley.
37.
Reynolds, C.R., Lowe, P.A., & Saenz, A.L. ( 1999). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 549-595). New York: Wiley.
38.
Shields, J., Konold, T.R., & Glutting, J.J. (2004). Validity of the Wide Range Intelligence Test: Differential effects across race/ethnicity, gender, and education level. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 287-303.
39.
Stinnett, T.A., Havey, J.M., & Oehler-Stinnett, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331-350.
40.
Suzuki, L.A., & Valencia, R.R. (1997). Race-ethnicity and measured intelligence. American Psychologist, 52, 1103-1114.
41.
Wasserman, J.D., & Tulsky, D.S. ( 2005). The origins of intellectual processing. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford Press.
42.
Watkins, M.W. ( 2005). MacPotthoff: Regression bias analysis [computer software] . University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University/Author.
43.
Watkins, M.W., & Hetrick, C.J. ( 1999). MacPotthoff: Automated calculation of the Potthoff regression bias procedure. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 710-711.
44.
Wechsler, D. ( 1939). Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. New York: Psychological Corporation.
45.
Wechsler, D. ( 1949). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children . New York: Psychological Corporation .
46.
Wechsler, D. ( 1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
47.
Wechsler, D. ( 1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
48.
Wechsler, D. ( 1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
49.
Wechsler, D. ( 2001). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
50.
Wechsler, D. ( 2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
51.
Weiss, L.G., & Prifitera, A. ( 1995). An evaluation of differential prediction of WIAT achievement scores from WISC-III FSIQ across ethnic and gender groups. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 297-304.
52.
Weiss, L.G., Prifitera, A., & Roid, G. ( 1993). The WISC-III and the fairness of predicting achievement across ethnic and gender groups. Advances in Psychoeducational Assessment; The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Third Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Monograph Series, 35-42.
53.
Wilson, M.S., & Reschly, D.J. ( 1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice . School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.
