Factor Invariance Assessment of the Dean–Woodcock Sensory–Motor Battery for Patients With ADHD Versus Nonclinical Subjects

Abstract

The current study examined the measurement invariance of the Dean–Woodcock Sensory–Motor Battery (DWSMB) for children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and an age- and gender-matched nonclinical sample. The DWSMB is a promising new instrument for assessing a wide range of cortical and subcortical sensory and motor skills and has been shown to conform to a three-factor latent structure for the nonclinical population. Because this instrument is used with a broad spectrum of individuals, including those with ADHD, it is important to verify that it does indeed measure the same constructs in the same way. The results of the invariance analyses showed that there were specific indicators on the DWSMB that were not invariant between the two groups, though the majority of the measurement model was found to be invariant. Specifically, several tasks that required sustained attention were not as effective for individuals with ADHD as they were for nonclinical subjects. In addition, certain measures of motor coordination were not as strongly associated with the latent variables for those with ADHD as compared with the nonclinical individuals. A number of clinical implications from these findings are discussed in detail.

Keywords

measurement invariance ADHD Dean—Woodcock Sensory—Motor Battery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashtari, M. , Kumar, S. , Bhaskar, S.L. , Clarke, T. , Thaden, E. , Cervellione, K.L. , et al. (2005). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A preliminary diffusion tensor imaging study. Biological Psychiatry , 57, 448-455.

Bentler, P.M. ( 1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

Brookes, R.L. , & Stirling, J. ( 2005). The cerebellar deficit hypothesis and dyslexic tendencies in a non-clinical sample. Dyslexia, 11, 174-185.

Brown, T.A. ( 2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

Browne, M.W. , & Cudeck, R. ( 1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Carmona, S. , Vilarroya, O. , Bielsa, A. , Tremols, V. , Soliva, J.C. , Rovira, M. , et al. (2005). Global and regional gray matter reductions in ADHD: A voxel-based morphometric study. Neuroscience Letters , 389, 88-93.

Davis, A.S. , Finch, W.H. , Dean, R.S. , & Woodcock, R.W. (2006). Cortical and subcortical constructs of the Dean-Woodcock Sensory Motor Battery: A construct validity study. International Journal of Neuroscience, 116, 1157-1171.

Davis, A.S. , Finch, W.H. , Trinkle, J. , & Dean, R.S. ( 2006). Classification and regression tree analysis of a neurologically impaired and normal sample using sensory-motor tasks. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117, 11-23.

Davis, A.S. , Pass, L.A. , Finch, W.H. , Dean, R.S. , & Woodcock, R.W. (2007). The canonical relationship between sensory-motor functioning, cognitive processing, and achievement in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Unpublished manuscript.

10.

Dean, R.S. , & Woodcock, R.W. (2003). Examiners manual. Dean-Woodcock Neuro-psychological Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

11.

Harvey, W.J. , & Reid, G. ( 2003). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review of research on movement skill performance and physical fitness. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 1-25.

12.

Henson, R.K. ( 2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.

13.

Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . New York: Guilford Press.

14.

Krain, A.L. , & Castellanos, F.X. (2006). Brain development and ADHD . Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 433-444.

15.

Maller, S.J. , Konold, T.R. , & Glutting, J.J. (1998). WISC-III factor invariance across samples of children exhibiting appropriate and inappropriate test-session behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 467-474.

16.

Mardia, K.V. ( 1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications . Biometrika, 57, 519-530.

17.

Marsh, H.W. , Hau, K.-T. , & Wen, Z. ( 2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.

18.

Mostofsky, S.H. , Rimrodt, S.L. , Schafer, J.G.B. , Boyce, A. , Goldberg, M.C. , Pekar, J.J. , et al. (2006). Atypical motor and sensory cortex activation in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of simple sequential finger tapping. Biological Psychiatry, 59, 48-56.

19.

Mueller, R.O. ( 1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling. New York: Springer-Verlag.

20.

Muthén, L.K. , & Muthén, B.O. (2006). MPlus: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

21.

Piek, J.P. , Pitcher, T.M. , & Hay, D.A. ( 1999). Motor coordination and kinaesthesis in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 41, 159-165.

22.

Shapiro, E.S. , & Heick, P.F. ( 2004). School psychologist assessment practices in the evaluation of students referred for social/behavioral/emotional problems. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 551-561.

23.

Van Meel, C.S. , Oosterlaan, J. , Heslenfeld, D.J. , & Sergeant, J.A. (2005). Motivational effects on motor timing in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 451-460.

24.

Volpe, A.G. , Davis, A.S. , & Dean, R.S. ( 2006). Predicting global and specific neurological impairment with sensory-motor functioning. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology , 21, 203-210.

25.

Woodward, H.R. , Ridenour, T.A. , Dean, R.S. , & Woodcock, R.W. (2002). Generalizability of sensory and motor tests. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1115-1137.