Two experiments examine the psychometric effects of providing immediate feedback on the correctness of answers to open-ended questions, and allowing participants to revise their answers following feedback. Participants answering verbal and math questions are able to correct many of their initial incorrect answers, resulting in higher revised scores. In addition, the reliability of these scores is significantly higher than the reliability of scores based on no feedback. Finally, anxiety is significantly lower following a test section with feedback and revision.
Arkin, R.M., & Schumann, D.W. (1984). Effects of corrective testing: An extension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 835-843.
2.
Betz, N.E. ( 1977). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 259-266.
3.
Campione, J.C., & Brown, A.L. ( 1987). Linking dynamic testing with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic testing (pp. 82-115). New York: Guilford .
4.
DiBattista, D., & Gosse, L. ( 2006). Test anxiety and the immediate feedback assessment technique . Journal of Experimental Education, 74(4), 311-327.
5.
Educational Testing Service. (2006). GRE guide to the use of scores. Retrieved October 19, 2006, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/GRE/pdf/994994.pdf
6.
Educational Testing Service. (2008). Factors that can influence performance on the GRE General Test. Retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/GRE/pdf/gre_0809_factors_2006-07.pdf
Feldt, L.S. ( 1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34, 363-373.
9.
Gilman, D., & Ferry, P. ( 1972). Increasing test reliability through self-scoring procedures . Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, 205-207.
Hanna, G. ( 1975). Incremental reliability and validity of multiple-choice tests with an answer-until-correct procedure. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 175-178.
12.
Kulhavy, R.W., & Stock, W.A. ( 1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308.
13.
Pressey, S.L. ( 1926). A simple apparatus that gives tests and scores-and teaches . School and Society, 23(586), 373-376.
14.
Schmidt, R.A., Young, D.E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D.C. ( 1989). Summary knowledge results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
15.
Schooler, L.J., & Anderson, J.R. (1990). The disruptive potential of immediate feedback. The Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cambridge, MA.
16.
Spielberger, C.D. ( 1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17.
Strang, H.R., & Rust, J.O. ( 1973). The effects of immediate knowledge of results and task definition on multiple-choice answering. The Journal of Experimental Education, 42, 77-80.
18.
Waddel, D.L., & Blankenship, J.C. (1995). Answer changing: A meta-analysis of the prevalence and patterns. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 25, 155-158.
19.
Wainer, H. ( 1993). Some practical considerations when converting a linearly administered test to an adaptive format. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 12, 15-20.
20.
Wise, S.L., Plake, B.S., Pozehl, B.J., Barnes, L.B., & Luken, L.E. ( 1989). Providing item feedback in computer-based tests: Effects of initial success and failure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 479-486.
