Self-deception has become a construct of great interest in individual differences research because it has been associated with levels of resilience and mental health. The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) is a self-report measure used for quantifying self-deception. In this study we used Rasch modeling to examine the properties of the self-deception scale of the BIDR in terms of dimensionality, use of response category, sample appropriateness, and reliability. A total of 315 university students (ages 18-21) were administered the self-deception scale of the BIDR. Seven-category and 2-category scoring methods were compared, as approved by the developers of the scale. Overall, the 7-category model was the best fit for the data and the sample. We concluded that the scale has the best reliability using a 7-category model with Item 13 deleted. Because of low person measure separation and reliability, the appropriateness of use of this instrument in undergraduate populations is questioned; the use of the measure in populations with larger ranges of self-deception is not recommended.
Andrich, D. (1978). Rating formulation for ordered response categories . Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
2.
Baumeister, R.F. (1989). The optimal margin of illusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 176-189.
3.
Beretvas, S.N., Meyers, J.L., & Leite, W.L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 62, 570-589.
4.
Bonanno, G.A., Rennicke, C., & Dekel, S. (2005). Self-enhancement among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attack: Resilience or social maladjustment ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 984-998.
5.
Bond, T.G., & Fox, C.M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Brown, J.D. (1986). Evaluation of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.
7.
Campbell, J.D. (1986). Similarity and uniqueness: The effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 281-294.
8.
Campbell, W.K., Reeder, G.D., Sedikides, C., & Elliot, A.J. (2000). Narcissism and comparative self-enhancement strategies . Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 329-347.
9.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
10.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence . New York: Wiley.
11.
Embretson, S.E., & Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fox, C.M., & Jones, J.A. (1998). Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 30-45.
14.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1939). Mechanisms of self-deception. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 409-420.
15.
Golin, S., Terrell, T., Weitz, J., & Drost, P.L. (1979). The illusion of control in depressed patients . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 454-457.
16.
Holden, R.R., Starzyk, K.B., McLeod, L.D., & Edwards, M.J. (2000). Comparisons among the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (HPSI), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR). Assessment, 7, 163-175.
17.
John, O.P., & Robins, R.W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-219.
18.
Kroner, D.G., & Weekes, J.R. (1996). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity in an offender sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 323-333.
19.
Kuiper, N.A., & Derry, P.A. (1982). Depressed and nondepressed content self-reference in mild depression. Journal of Personality, 50, 67-79.
20.
Kusyszyn, I., & Jackson, D.N. (1968). A multimethod factor analytic appraisal of endorsement and judgment methods in personality assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 1047-1061.
21.
Lanyon, R.I., & Carle, A.C. (2007). Internal and external validity of scores on the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding and the Paulhus Deception scales . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859-876.
22.
Leite, W.L., & Beretvas, S.N. (2005). Validation of the scores on the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 65, 140-154.
23.
Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2007). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 525-544.
Linacre, J.M. (2005b). A user's guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago: Winsteps.com.
27.
Linacre, J.M., & Wright, B.D. (1998). A user's guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago: MESA Press.
28.
Meehl, P.E., & Hathaway, S.R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525-564.
29.
Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychology attitudes (pp. 17-59). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Paulhus, D.L. (1994). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Reference manual for BIDR version 6. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
31.
Paulhus, D.L. (1998). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding . Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
32.
Paulhus, D.L., & Reid, D.B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
33.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: Mesa Press.
34.
Rasch, G. (1977). On specific objectivity: An attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. In M. Blegvad (Ed.), The Danish yearbook of philosophy (pp. 58-94). Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard.
35.
Raskin, R., Novacek, J., & Hogan, R. (1991). Narcissism, self-esteem, and defensive self-enhancement . Journal of Personality, 59, 19-37.
36.
Robins, R.W., & Beer, J.S. (2001). Positive illusions about the self: Short-term benefits and long-term costs. Journal of Behavioral Medicine , 80, 340-352.
37.
Sackeim, H.A., & Gur, R.C. (1979). Self-deception, other-deception, and self-reported psychopathology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 47, 213-215.
38.
Salgado, J.F., Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D.S. (2002). Predictors used for personnel selection: An overview of constructs, methods and techniques. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Personnel psychology (pp. 165-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O.S., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B.A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology , 91, 25-39.
40.
Stober, J., Dette, D.E., & Musch, J. (2002). Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 370-389.
41.
Taylor, S.E., & Armor, D.A. (1996). Positive illusions and coping with adversity. Journal of Personality, 64, 873-897.
42.
Taylor, S.E., & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
43.
Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
44.
Wright, B.D., Linacre, J.M., Gustafen, J.E., & Martin-Lof, P. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
45.
Wright, B.D., & Masters, G.N. (1982). Ratings scale analysis. Chicago : University of Chicago, MESA Press.
46.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245-287.
47.
Zuckerman, M., & O'Laughlin, R.R. (2006). Self-enhancement by social comparison: A prospective analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 751-760.
