The procedures required to obtain the approximate posterior standard deviations of the parameters in the three commonly used item response models for dichotomous items are described and used to generate values for some common situations. The results were compared with those obtained from maximum likelihood estimation. It is shown that the use of priors may reduce the instability of estimates of the item parameters, assuming the choice of priors is reasonable. The sample size required for acceptable accuracy for the purposes of practical applications of item response theory may be inferred from tables or computer programs. It is suggested that the careful selection of priors be exercised to obtain the required precision when three-parameter models are applied in these situations.
Albert, J.H. (1992). Bayesian estimation of normal ogive item response curves using Gibbs sampling. Journal of Educational Statistics , 17, 251-269.
2.
Assessment Systems Corporation. (1996). XCALIBRE: Marginal maximum-likelihood estimation program [Computer software] . St. Paul, MN: Author.
3.
Baker, F.B. (1988). The item log-likelihood surface for two- and three-parameter item characteristic curve models. Applied Psychological Measurement , 12, 387-395.
4.
Baker, F.B. (1998). An investigation of the item parameter recovery characteristics of a Gibbs sampling approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 153-169.
5.
Baker, F.B., & Kim, S.-H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
6.
Berger, J.O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
du Toit, M. (Ed.). (2003). IRT from SSI. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
8.
Garwood, F. (1941). The application of maximum likelihood to dosage-mortality curves. Biometrika, 32, 46-58.
9.
Harwell, M.R., & Janosky, J.E. (1991). An empirical study of the effects of small datasets and varying prior variance on item parameter estimation in BILOG. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 279-291.
10.
Hogg, R.V., & Craig, A.T. (1978). Introduction to mathematical statistics (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
11.
Holland, P.W. (1990). The Dutch identity: A new tool for the study of item response models. Psychometrika, 55, 5-18.
12.
Lord, F.M. (1974). Estimation of latent ability and item parameters when there are omitted responses. Psychometrika, 39, 247-264.
13.
Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Lord, F.M. (1983). Statistical bias in maximum likelihood estimators of item parameters. Psychometrika, 48, 425-435.
15.
Lord, F.M. (1986). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian parameter estimation in item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement , 23, 157-162.
Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models [Computer software]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software International.
18.
Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D.L. (1984). Applied Bayesian and classical inference: The case of the FederalistPapers. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
Patz, R.J., & Junker, B.W. (1999). A straightforward approach to Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 146-178.
20.
Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J.A. (1982). Bayesian estimation in the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 175-191.
21.
Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J.A. (1983). Estimation of parameters in the three-parameter latent trait model. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing (pp. 13-30). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J.A. (1985). Bayesian estimation in the two-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 50, 349-364.
23.
Swaminathan, H., & Gifford, J.A. (1986). Bayesian estimation in the three-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 51, 581-601.
24.
Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 47, 175-186.
25.
Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG user's guide: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
26.
Thissen, D., Chen, W.-H., & Bock, R.D. (2002). MULTILOG [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International .
27.
Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1982). Some standard errors in item response theory. Psychometrika, 47, 397-412.
28.
Tsutakawa, R.K. (1992). Prior distribution for item response curves. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 51-74.
29.
Tsutakawa, R.K., & Johnson, J.C. (1990). The effect of uncertainly of item parameter estimation on ability estimates. Psychometrika, 55, 371-390.
